Sam Judge is a partner and patent attorney at Page White Farrer, specialising in chemical and pharmaceutical patent work. With experience spanning drafting, prosecution, opposition and appeals, Sam brings a calm, analytical approach to complex matters, shaped by hands-on industry experience and a steady progression within a full-service IP firm.
Quick profile
Name: Sam Judge Role: Partner and Patent Attorney Firm:Page White Farrer Location: London, UK Areas of expertise: Chemical and pharmaceutical patents, drafting and prosecution, European oppositions and appeals, portfolio strategy
From chemistry to patents
Sam’s route into the patent profession began early, sparked by exposure to laboratory work before university. A short internship at the National Physical Laboratory introduced him to hands-on scientific research, but it also prompted some frank advice. Several colleagues suggested that patent law offered stronger long-term prospects for someone with a scientific background.
That advice stayed with him. While studying chemistry at university, Sam explored what the patent attorney role involved and recognised it as a good fit. He enjoyed theory and problem-solving more than lab work, and the profession offered a way to stay close to science without being tied to the bench.
Graduating during the financial crisis shaped his next steps. Sam spent time working in the pharmaceutical industry as an analytical chemist, gaining valuable practical experience before completing a postgraduate certificate in IP law. That combination helped him secure a traineeship and begin formal training in the profession.
Growing within one firm
Sam joined Page White Farrer in 2012 and has progressed from trainee to partner within the firm. He credits this development not to a single defining moment, but to a series of incremental experiences and supportive supervision along the way.
Early training played an important role. Having a patient and even-handed supervisor helped Sam persevere through the demanding exam process and build confidence in his developing skills. Over time, exposure to different senior colleagues also allowed him to observe and adopt approaches he admired, particularly in how technical arguments and amendments were presented.
A broad chemical practice
Today, Sam is the firm’s lead chemist. His work focuses primarily on pharmaceuticals, supported by experience in materials science and other chemical technologies that come across a varied client base. He handles drafting and prosecution work alongside European opposition matters, giving him a rounded view of how applications stand up under challenge.
That combination directly informs his approach. Seeing how claims are attacked in opposition helps him identify potential weaknesses during drafting. Equally, experience drafting broad claims provides insight into where opposing parties are likely to press their arguments. For Sam, these different strands of work reinforce each other rather than sitting in isolation.
Alongside technical work, Sam has become increasingly involved in business development. This includes speaking at conferences, engaging with clients directly, and expanding relationships internationally, particularly with contacts in India that have grown from inherited client work.
Keeping perspective under pressure
With experience comes confidence, and Sam describes a noticeable shift in how he now handles complex or high-stakes matters. Situations that might once have felt intimidating are approached calmly, informed by having seen similar issues before.
That does not mean taking the work lightly. Sam is acutely aware that the inventions he advises on often represent years of research and significant investment. However, he believes that staying calm is essential. Clients need clear thinking, and effective advocacy depends on identifying issues and addressing them methodically.
This mindset also extends to communication. Early in his career, Sam tended towards very formal written correspondence. Over time, he learned to adapt tone depending on the audience. The underlying principles have stayed the same; what has changed is the scale, with advice now often framed at portfolio level rather than around a single application.
Learning through teaching and mentoring
Although client work remains central, Sam also values the perspective gained from teaching and mentoring. Delivering occasional lectures and training sessions exposes him to unexpected questions that force a return to first principles. These moments highlight how concepts that feel routine to practitioners can be challenging for others.
Mentoring new starters serves a similar purpose. Being asked to explain why things are done in a certain way prompts reflection on habits formed through experience. For Sam, this helps avoid relying too heavily on instinct and keeps his reasoning sharp and explicit.
Watching the profession evolve
In terms of wider trends, Sam sees European patent practice as relatively stable. Incremental procedural debates continue, but no single issue dominates day-to-day advice. The area he is watching most closely is artificial intelligence. While there is significant discussion around generative AI and its potential role in drafting, Sam remains cautious but is open to its future impact.
Switching off beyond the office
Away from work, Sam has found very different ways to reset. Since mid-2024, he has been taking flying lessons in gliders, an experience he describes as worlds apart from patent law. While both involve precision and learning how systems work, flying requires quicker decision-making and physical coordination.
He also runs regularly, preferring to head out alone and set his own pace. Running offers a simple mental reset, with no structure beyond putting one foot in front of the other. Travel and hiking feature too, with memorable trips including Iceland and Japan, where scenery and food have been as much a draw as the destinations themselves.
Lessons learned
When asked what advice he would give to those earlier in their IP careers, Sam’s answer is consistent and deliberate: don’t panic. Patent work is, at its core, about advocacy. Understanding that, and learning how to apply it calmly, comes with time and experience.
If there is a single principle guiding his approach today, it is exactly that. Keep calm, focus on what needs to be done, and deal with each issue clearly and methodically.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Jane Wainwright is a former patent attorney and equity partner who now works as a coach supporting IP professionals. After 23 years in private practice, including leadership roles at Potter Clarkson, she founded her own coaching business to help individuals across the IP sector navigate career progression, leadership pressure and personal growth.
Quick Profile
Name:Jane Wainwright Role: Executive and Leadership Coach Organisation:Starry Eyed Pragmatics Location: UK Areas of expertise: Coaching IP professionals, leadership development, career progression, strengths and values work, team and group coaching
From patent attorney to coach
Jane spent 23 years in the patent profession, beginning as a trainee and progressing to equity partner and Head of Biotech at Potter Clarkson. She also served on the executive board. Alongside her technical work, she increasingly found herself drawn to leadership and people development.
While a partner, she set up a leadership development programme for junior partners preparing for equity. The programme included coaching and training in areas not typically covered in attorney qualifications, such as finance and HR. As part of the first cohort, Jane undertook coaching herself.
That experience proved pivotal. Coaching helped her develop her leadership style and think differently about how she supported others. Encouraged by her own coach, she undertook formal coach training. Over time, she realised that coaching was the work she most enjoyed.
Leaving the profession after more than two decades was daunting. But she describes the move as a way of giving back to a profession that had shaped her career. Today, she works primarily with IP professionals, combining sector understanding with independent perspective.
What IP professionals bring to coaching
Jane is careful not to oversimplify the issues her clients face. While there are recurring themes, every coaching relationship is different.
Career progression and promotion feature strongly, particularly for those aiming for equity partnership. Many want to develop executive presence, authority or confidence in leadership roles. Others are balancing professional ambition with family life and personal commitments.
She also sees a strong perfectionist tendency within the IP profession. High standards are essential, but perfectionism can become exhausting. A key part of her work is helping people recognise when “good enough” really is enough.
At senior levels, challenges can become more isolating. Partners and firm owners often lack safe spaces to discuss pressures or uncertainties. Conversations with peers may feel commercially sensitive. Coaching provides an independent, confidential environment where they can explore concerns openly.
Coaching versus training and mentoring
Jane draws a clear distinction between professional training, mentoring and coaching.
Training focuses on learning the technical and legal aspects of the job. Mentoring involves sharing experience and advice from someone further along the path.
Coaching, by contrast, is not about giving answers. It is about asking the right questions and creating space for reflection. The client does most of the talking. The coach facilitates exploration and problem-solving, helping the individual find their own solutions.
For Jane, the value lies in enabling people to think clearly about what matters to them. She works extensively with strengths and values. By understanding personal values, clients can assess whether their work aligns with what matters most to them. Where there is misalignment, they can consider changes.
Similarly, identifying strengths helps people “job craft” within their role. Someone strong in relationship building may thrive in business development. Someone with exceptional attention to detail may excel in professional standards or training roles. Aligning work with strengths often increases both effectiveness and satisfaction.
Pressure, vulnerability and progression
Jane believes coaching can be valuable at many career stages, but particularly at the senior end.
As responsibility increases, opportunities for open and vulnerable conversation often decrease. Prospective partners may hesitate to share concerns with existing partners. Established partners may worry about appearing uncertain in front of peers.
Coaching creates space for honest reflection without judgement. It can also help individuals understand the realities of business ownership before stepping into partnership. This preparation can make leadership transitions smoother.
She also challenges assumptions about the cost of coaching. While it requires time, she sees clear commercial benefits. Greater confidence, stronger client relationships and improved performance in areas such as oral proceedings can outweigh the investment.
Growth on both sides
Coaching has shaped Jane’s own development as much as it has her clients’.
Through her training and practice, she came to recognise and address her own imposter syndrome. Seeing the impact of her work on others has strengthened her confidence. Measuring the difference she makes for clients has been more tangible than measuring her own achievements in isolation.
What motivates her most is witnessing change. She describes the satisfaction of seeing someone move from confusion or stress to clarity and action. Promotions, improved confidence or simply a renewed sense of direction all bring a visible shift.
For Jane, that moment when “the spark” appears makes the work worthwhile.
Life beyond IP
Outside work, Jane describes herself as someone who does “lots of different things, but nothing” — a reflection of varied interests rather than inactivity.
She enjoys time with her cockapoo, long walks and camper van adventures. Travel is a particular passion, especially visits to Disney parks and cruises, which she describes as her “happy place”. She also experiments with 3D design, digital illustration and creative projects.
Closer to home, a favourite regular walk is at Shipley Country Park near Ilkeston, a 5.5km route through fields, trees and reservoirs. It is a simple routine that offers space and perspective.
Ready to be coachable
For IP professionals curious about coaching, Jane offers a clear message. Coaching can be for anyone, but it requires readiness.
Being “coachable” means being open to change and willing to put in the work. Without that commitment, coaching may not be effective. With it, the possibilities can be significant.
After more than two decades in the patent profession, Jane’s focus has shifted from drafting and prosecution to personal development and leadership growth. Yet her aim remains aligned with the profession she knows well: helping people perform at their best, in ways that are sustainable and true to who they are.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Mark Sweetinburgh is a dual-qualified patent and trade mark attorney and co-founder of Sweetinburgh & Windsor. Based in Crawley, he works closely with UK businesses to provide commercially focused IP advice. His perspective reflects both long-standing technical expertise and the realities of running an independent IP firm.
Quick profile
Name:Mark Sweetinburgh Role: Partner, Patent and Trade Mark Attorney Firm:Sweetinburgh & Windsor Location: Crawley, West Sussex, UK Areas of expertise: Patents, trade marks, registered designs, freedom to operate, commercially focused IP strategy
From biochemistry to intellectual property
Mark’s route into the IP profession was shaped by curiosity rather than a fixed career plan. After studying biochemistry at the University of Bath, he knew research was not for him long term. What appealed instead was understanding how things work and applying that knowledge in a practical way.
An advert in New Scientist introduced him to the patent profession, without the language requirements he had assumed were mandatory. The role offered variety, exposure to cutting-edge technology, and a legal dimension that appealed. He entered the profession in 2001 and trained in London before deciding that commuting and city life were not where he wanted to stay.
Shaping a commercially focused approach
Mark’s early years were spent in medium-sized firms with strong client contact. Working closely with universities and SMEs helped shape a practical, commercially minded outlook that still defines his work today.
Although trained as a biochemist, his practice quickly broadened. Mechanical inventions, trade marks and infringement matters became part of his everyday work. That breadth, he feels, benefits many of the businesses he works with, particularly those looking for joined-up advice across patents, trade marks and designs alongside their wider commercial strategy.
A consistent question has guided his career: what is the point of filing a patent? Keeping that commercial focus has influenced both the advice he gives and the type of firm he wanted to build.
Founding an independent firm
The idea of running his own firm appealed early on and Mark founded
Sweetinburgh & Windsor in 2011 with Louise Windsor. With a growing team they have expanded their technical expertise whilst keeping a focus on what is important to clients and work closely with clients who value a hands-on, almost in-house style of support.
Wearing multiple hats
Day to day, Mark balances technical work with the realities of running a small business. Client work remains central, but his role also involves marketing, training, managing the team and thinking strategically about growth.
He enjoys the variety. Working with clients on grant funding, freedom to operate and IP strategy keeps the role interesting and connected to how businesses actually operate.
Training is another important strand. Mark regularly works with inventors to help them recognise patentable ideas and understand how IP fits into their wider commercial plans. He also delivers talks to students and schools, helping demystify the profession and highlight it as a career option.
How the profession has changed
One of the biggest shifts Mark has seen is the changing structure of the profession itself. When he started, most firms were London-based and relatively large. Regional and small independent firms were far less common.
That has changed significantly, particularly over the past decade. Remote working and consultancy models have opened up more choice, both for clients and for IP professionals. Mark sees this as a positive development. Businesses can now choose advisers that better match their size, sector and way of working.
The role of the patent attorney has also evolved. It is no longer about reading and writing letters in isolation. Client contact, commercial awareness and strategic thinking are now central to the job.
Leading and supporting others
Mark describes his leadership style as leading by example. Experience has shaped his approach, but the core aim has stayed the same: creating an environment where people are supported and able to shape their roles around their interests.
Flexibility is key. In a smaller firm, roles can evolve, and that adaptability benefits both staff and clients. Mark sees this as one of the strengths of independent practice.
Outside the office
Away from work, Mark values time that helps him switch off. He enjoys spending time with family, walking, reading and DIY. Fixing and building things has been a long-standing interest, one that mirrors his professional curiosity.
Sport also plays a role. He plays football weekly when he can, enjoys golf, and likes watching a wide range of sports. Switching off work phones and creating clear boundaries is important, particularly in a world of hybrid working.
Reflections and lessons learned
Looking back, one lesson stands out. Peaks and troughs are part of professional life, especially when running a firm. Learning not to panic during quiet periods, and not to struggle in silence during busy ones, has been important.
Asking for help, outsourcing when needed, and being open about workload are lessons Mark wishes he had embraced earlier. They remain relevant at every stage of a career.
Upcoming events
Mark is planning to attend CITMA in London in March and INTA in London in May. If you’re attending either event and would like to connect, he’s always happy to hear from fellow IP professionals.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Nonny Jones is a UK and European patent attorney and co-founder of Alembia Intellectual Property. With a background in chemistry and extensive experience in the pharmaceutical sector, he brings a practical, commercially aware approach shaped by years spent on the in-house side of the table.
Quick profile
Name:Nonny Jones Role: Patent Attorney, Co-owner and Co-founder Firm:Alembia Intellectual Property Location: United Kingdom Areas of expertise: Chemistry, life sciences, pharmaceuticals, patent drafting and prosecution, portfolio strategy, due diligence, licensing and litigation support
From chemistry to patent law
Nonny’s route into patent law was far from pre-planned. He trained as an organic chemist, completing a PhD and spending several years in academia before achieving a long-held ambition: becoming a medicinal chemist hunting new drugs. It was during this time, working within a large pharmaceutical company, that he first encountered patents at close quarters.
Rather than sparking immediate fascination, those early encounters were tinged with apprehension. Patents, he recalls, were both critical and intimidating. They underpinned everything the wider business was doing, yet felt complex and high-stakes. Over time however, that exposure, combined with conversations with friends who had moved into patent law, planted a seed.
A major turning point came when the research site where Nonny worked unfortunately closed. While challenging, redundancy opened up an unexpected opportunity: an trainee patent attorney role within the same organisation. The move proved formative.
Training inside a company meant going in at the deep end, with huge responsibility from day one. While initially intimidating, being embedded in project teams, addressing intertwined scientific, legal and commercial issues, and seeing how IP decisions played out across the full lifecycle of a product provided a unique, commercially-focussed grounding that has informed Nonny’s approach to patent work ever since.
“It was a privileged position,” he reflects. “As an in-house patent attorney, you experience everything, from early research through to commercial strategy. You see first-hand the impact of IP-related decisions and events on development, which teaches how to spot and mitigate issues early.”
Shaping a career through challenge and risk
As his career progressed, Nonny found himself repeatedly stepping into situations that felt uncomfortable at the time, but ultimately shaped how he works today. One such moment was taking on responsibility for coordinating complex litigation on a major pharmaceutical product while still relatively junior.
The experience was demanding, but rewarding. It required judgement, confidence and the ability to make decisions with imperfect information, often under extreme time pressure – all key patent attorney skills which were developed and tested in courts across Europe.
That willingness to take calculated risks eventually led to Nonny leaving industry for private practice and co-founding Alembia Intellectual Property with his business partner, Lucy. What began as a daunting idea soon felt like a logical next step.
“It wasn’t about trying to disrupt the profession,” he says. “It was more about asking whether we could build something successful that reflected how we liked to work.”
Eight years later, Alembia Intellectual Property is still growing, shaped by those early decisions and a shared set of values. The practice has even been externally recognised: “one unexpected milestone we’re very proud of is being listed since 2020 in the IAM patent 1000 alongside many other great UK and European patent firms – a huge achievement for a small boutique like ours, and particularly pleasing because it’s based on direct client feedback”.
A varied role with a familiar focus
Today, Nonny’s role combines client work with running a small business. While company management and business development are part of the picture, he spends most of his time doing what he enjoys most: working closely with clients on a wide range of IP issues.
The work spans patent drafting, strategic advice, due diligence, licensing and agreement work as well as occasional litigation support. Moving from an in-house role to private practice has increased the variety of subject matter Nonny handles, and it now extends not only across life sciences but into engineering and materials technology. It has also brought exposure to client companies of different sizes, at different stages, with very different priorities.
What hasn’t changed is the mindset. Nonny remains focused on understanding what clients are trying to achieve and tailoring IP advice accordingly, rather than treating patents as an end in themselves. In this respect, his industrial background provides a particular advantage: “having worked on in- and out-licensing for one of the world’s largest pharma companies, Lucy and I know first-hand what investors are looking for in an IP portfolio. It’s great to be able to apply that knowledge to help current clients secure funding and reach their own goals.”
Chemistry at the centre
Chemistry continues to underpin much of Nonny’s practice. He sees it as a central discipline, connecting physics on one side and biology on the other, which makes it possible for chemically-trained patent attorneys to work across multiple fields.
His background as a medicinal chemist also makes it easier to move seamlessly between small molecule chemical, biological, and pharmaceutical development inventions, a significant advantage when assisting modern clients who often use multi-modal approaches to drug discovery.
Making “pseudo in-house” practical
Alembia often describes its approach as “pseudo in-house”, a term Nonny is keen to ground in reality rather than rhetoric. For him, it comes down to accessibility.
Small and growing companies often hesitate to speak to lawyers early, particularly when budgets are tight. That hesitation can lead to avoidable problems later. Alembia’s aim is to lower that barrier by encouraging informal conversations and focusing billing on substantive work, rather than ringing up the till for every interaction.
The goal is not to replicate an in-house attorney exactly, but to create a proactive, informal environment where clients feel able to ask questions early and often.
“I’d rather spend ten minutes on the phone helping someone think something through before it becomes an issue than hours to try and fix a problem after the fact,” Nonny explains.
Balancing detail with commercial reality
For Nonny, good patent advice starts with outcomes. While technical detail and legal nuance are essential, they only matter if they serve a client’s broader goals.
He is conscious of the temptation to over-focus on the intricacies of patent law, particularly when speaking to non-specialists. Instead, he prioritises clarity, helping clients understand how IP can help clients achieve their goals, and only getting into the technical weeds when it is important to show why a particular strategy makes sense.
Navigating change in the IP landscape
Asked about recent changes in the profession, Nonny points to artificial intelligence as both an opportunity and a challenge.
Used carefully, AI can be a powerful tool for summarising information and checking thinking. Used uncritically, it carries real risks.
Machine-learning hallucinations, confidentiality concerns and over-reliance are all issues he believes the profession must manage carefully. While optimistic about AI’s long-term potential, he emphasises the continued need for judgement, diligence and accountability.
“AI users don’t just need answers,” he says. “They need confidence in those answers.”
For now, Nonny sees AI as a potentially transformative resource to be handled carefully, not delegated to blindly.
Values that guide the work
Across a varied career, one value has remained central for Nonny: taking pride in his work.
Patents are often stressful for clients, high-stakes by nature, and slow to deliver results. Helping clients navigate that process, make informed decisions, and move forward with confidence is where he finds the most satisfaction. Whether the task is large or small, the aim is always the same: to make something difficult feel more manageable, and enable clients to focus on the day-to-day business of getting their innovations to market.
Advice for those considering IP
For scientists thinking about patent law, Nonny offers an honest assessment. The career can be intellectually stimulating and rewarding, combining science, law and commercial thinking in a way few roles do.
At the same time, it carries pressure and responsibility. Deadlines are tight, decisions matter, and the work demands care.
His advice is to speak to people in the profession, seek exposure where possible, and understand what the role really involves before committing.
“It’s not for everyone,” he says. “But for the right person, it can be incredibly satisfying.”
Life beyond IP
Outside work, Nonny’s life centres on family. With a young son (and cat!) and the demands of running a business, switching off is less about hobbies and more about spending quality time together.
He also retains a strong connection to Anglesey, where he grew up. A coastal walk from Bull Bay to Porth Wen remains a favourite, offering rugged scenery, wildlife and a sense of perspective when he gets the chance to return.
Looking forward
Reflecting on his career so far, Nonny takes pride in key career milestones that include high pressure licensing deals, litigation wins and the formation of Alembia IP, but also his everyday work. While the big ticket results often get the most attention, he still finds few things as satisfying as successfully arguing against a complex patent office objection, or informing a client of a patent grant.
For him, success lies in steady progress, thoughtful, accessible advice and long-term relationships built on trust.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Mark Jolly is a partner and patent and design attorney at Wilson Gunn, based in Manchester. With a practice spanning patents, registered designs and enforcement work, he brings a practical, people-focused approach to advising clients across automotive, medical devices and fast-moving consumer goods.
Quick profile
Name:Mark Jolly Role: Partner, Patent and Design Attorney Firm:Wilson Gunn Location: Manchester, UK Areas of expertise: Patents, registered designs, IP enforcement, strategic IP advice
Finding a route into IP
Mark’s path into intellectual property was more deliberate than many. At school, he chose a degree that combined science with patent law, allowing him to pursue both a technical subject he enjoyed and an early interest in legal work. A sandwich year spent with a firm of patent attorneys during his studies confirmed that the profession was the right fit.
That early exposure meant Mark entered the profession with clarity about what he wanted to do. He spent around a decade at a London firm before making the move to Manchester and joining Wilson Gunn, where he has now been for over ten years.
A role shaped by people and opportunity
Today, Mark’s role as a partner combines advisory work, supervision and strategic thinking. While he is still closely involved in client matters, much of his time is spent discussing approach, reviewing work prepared by colleagues, and helping shape broader portfolio strategies.
He reflects that this is a natural shift many patent attorneys experience over time. Early career work after qualification can be solitary and document-heavy, while senior roles tend to involve far more conversation, collaboration and judgement. For Mark, that evolution has been a positive one.
Building a design-focused practice
A notable feature of Mark’s work is the volume of registered design and enforcement matters he handles. He traces this specialism back largely to chance and curiosity. Early in his career, he took an interest in design law at a time when European registered designs were brand new, and that willingness to “put his hand up” led to more work in the area.
Design work, he explains, offers a different rhythm to patents. It can be more visual, more immediate, and often allows for quicker initial views. That contrast, along with the creative thinking involved in defining what really matters in a design and working out how to protect that across the quite disparate systems of international design protection, is something he continues to enjoy.
Enforcement followed a similar path. At Wilson Gunn, there is a greater appetite for handling contentious work in-house, at least in its early stages. Over time, this has built confidence and experience, making enforcement a more routine and less intimidating part of his practice.
Working with clients who value IP
Mark works with clients across automotive, medical devices and fast-moving consumer goods, each bringing different rewards. Automotive work reflects a lifelong personal interest, while FMCG clients offer the satisfaction of working on products that are tangible, familiar and visible in the market.
He particularly values working with businesses where intellectual property is central to commercial success. In those cases, IP is not an afterthought but an integral part of product development, with advisers playing a role in shaping innovation as well as protecting it.
Across all sectors, Mark emphasises the importance of relationships. Enjoyment of the work often comes down to the people involved, both clients and colleagues, and he considers himself fortunate to work with teams that collaborate well and share common goals.
Rigour first, then commercial reality
When advising clients, Mark does not see legal and commercial considerations as competing forces. In his view, understanding the legal position is a necessary first step. Only once that groundwork is done can realistic commercial options be explored.
This approach is particularly important in enforcement matters, where time, cost and outcomes rarely align perfectly with principle. Helping clients develop realistic expectations is, he says, a key part of the advisor’s role.
A changing enforcement landscape
One of the biggest challenges Mark sees today is the shift of enforcement activity away from courts and towards online platforms. Takedown procedures on large e-commerce sites can be fast and effective, but also inconsistent, with the likes of Amazon sometimes acting on design rights that are clearly invalid.
This creates uncertainty for both rights holders and legitimate businesses who are accused of infringement. Mark has been closely involved in discussions and official consultations around these issues, drawing on his day-to-day experience to inform proposed solutions and contributing to CIPA’s submissions.
Life beyond IP
Outside work, Mark keeps busy. He spends much of his time with his young children, fitting his own interests around their activities. He enjoys backgammon, squash, cricket and skiing. And, finds that being active—particularly in the mountains—is one of the best ways to switch off.
Advice shaped by experience
For those considering a career in IP, Mark’s message is simple. It is a rewarding profession with room to shape a career around individual strengths. He encourages people to get involved, ask questions, and volunteer for work that interests them.
Just as importantly, he notes that enjoyment of the profession often depends on environment. A difficult experience in one role does not mean the career itself is wrong. Finding the right people to work with can make all the difference.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub. Find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Simon Kremer is a Partner and European and UK Patent Attorney at Mewburn Ellis, specialising in life sciences. With nearly three decades at the firm, he brings a deeply practical perspective shaped by experience across patents, oppositions, appeals and long-standing client relationships.
Quick profile
Name:Simon Kremer Role: Partner, European & UK Patent Attorney Firm:Mewburn Ellis LLP Location: London, UK Areas of expertise: Life sciences patents, oppositions and appeals at the European Patent Office, synthetic and engineering biology, therapeutics, plant biotechnology, due diligence
Finding a route into IP
Simon’s route into intellectual property was not a planned one. After completing a PhD in biochemistry at the University of Bristol and spending time working at the laboratory bench, he realised that an academic career was not the right long-term fit. A visit to the university careers service in the early 1990s introduced him—almost by chance—to the patent attorney profession.
What appealed was the combination of science and law, and the opportunity to continue engaging deeply with new technologies without remaining in academia. That balance has remained central to his career ever since.
A broad foundation in government IP
Before joining private practice, Simon began his IP career at the UK Ministry of Defence’s Intellectual Property Rights department. The role provided unusually broad exposure, covering far more than patents alone. His work ranged from contracts and procurement to international agreements, crown use provisions and advising other government departments that lacked their own IP expertise.
That experience gave him an early appreciation of how IP operates “at the coalface”, and of the consequences when it is handled poorly. Seeing how intellectual property decisions could affect everything from basic procurement to major defence projects helped shape his practical, commercially grounded approach.
Milestones rather than turning points
Looking back over almost 30 years at Mewburn Ellis, Simon does not frame his career in terms of dramatic turning points. Instead, he sees it as a series of professional milestones: conducting his first EPO hearings, leading Board of Appeal cases, meeting long-standing clients in person after years of correspondence, and guiding clients through major due diligence exercises.
Alongside these were internal milestones—joining the partnership, contributing to the firm’s growth, and training successive generations of patent attorneys. Over time, both Simon’s role and the firm itself evolved significantly, with Mewburn Ellis growing from a small partnership into a much larger organisation.
Balancing multiple responsibilities
Today, Simon’s role spans client work, mentoring, training, management responsibilities and business development. While the scope of the role has broadened over time, he remains closely involved in day-to-day client matters and values staying connected to the practical work.
His technical focus continues to be driven largely by clients. Areas such as synthetic and engineering biology, plant-related technologies and therapeutics feature prominently, reflecting both long-standing expertise and emerging technological importance.
Translating complexity into value
A recurring theme in Simon’s approach is experience—particularly the experience of seeing patents through their full lifecycle. Having drafted applications that have later been challenged and then exploited, he has developed a strong sense of how early drafting decisions can shape outcomes decades later.
This perspective allows him to anticipate what clients may need at different stages, even when they cannot articulate it themselves. For Simon, a key part of the patent attorney’s role is understanding not just the invention, but the purpose the IP needs to serve over time, while balancing commercial realities such as funding and cost.
The reality of oppositions and appeals
Oppositions and appeals before the European Patent Office form a significant part of Simon’s practice. He is candid about the demands of this work, describing the preparation phase as intense and emotionally draining. The challenge lies in mastering every detail and ensuring there are no surprises on the day.
The reward comes from presenting a case clearly and confidently, knowing that every argument has been tested in advance. While outcomes cannot always be controlled, Simon values ensuring that clients are fully prepared for both the process and the result.
Adapting to different clients
Simon works with a wide range of clients, from individual inventors and universities to multinational companies. Adapting his approach comes down, again, to experience. Different clients require different levels of explanation and guidance. Understanding the journey each client is likely to take helps shape how advice is delivered.
For some, the process is as much educational as it is legal; for others, it is about providing targeted support within an established in-house framework.
Industry pressures and evolving standards
When it comes to broader industry trends, Simon points less to headline topics and more to practical realities. Funding environments have a direct and immediate impact on patent strategy, particularly in the life sciences, where global protection is costly and long-term.
He also notes that as technologies mature and tools become more accessible, the bar for inventiveness continues to rise. Areas such as biotechnology require increasingly creative approaches to meet patentability standards, even as the underlying science becomes more routine.
Learning from the wider profession
Beyond client work, Simon has remained active within the profession through bodies such as CIPA. He values the opportunity to engage with peers outside his own firm in a collaborative rather than adversarial setting.
These interactions provide alternative perspectives and reinforce the social and collegiate nature of the profession. While they may not directly change day-to-day practice, they have helped shape the kind of attorney Simon has become.
Passing on hard-earned lessons
In mentoring younger colleagues, Simon focuses on helping them understand what clients truly value. While clients can assess responsiveness and reliability, they cannot easily judge the quality of a patent application. That responsibility rests firmly with the attorney.
Sharing lessons learned from seeing patents challenged years after drafting is central to his approach to training, helping the next generation appreciate the long-term impact of their decisions.
Life beyond IP
Outside work, Simon is an enthusiastic walker, particularly in the Lake District, where he has been visiting since childhood and has completed all of the Wainwrights. Football also plays a big part in his life, both as a player in five-a-side matches and (with the rest of the family) as a supporter of Sunderland AFC.
These activities provide a welcome counterbalance to the demands of professional life. Even if they sometimes have to be managed carefully alongside ageing knees and ankles.
Looking ahead
What continues to motivate Simon is the constant exposure to new technologies and the depth of long-term client relationships. Whether working with a familiar client or exploring a new disclosure, there is always something new to learn.
For those considering a career in patent law, his advice is to research the profession carefully. Also, join an organisation that is actively engaging with technological change, including the growing role of AI. Adaptability, he believes, will be as important in the future as experience has been in his own career.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub. Find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Emilio Berkenwald is Partner and Head of the Patent Department at BERKEN IP in Argentina, where he leads a technically trained team handling substantive patent drafting and prosecution work. With a background in engineering, research and teaching, Emilio brings a European-style approach to patent practice, focused on technical depth, strategy and international collaboration.
Quick profile
Name: Emilio Berkenwald Role: Partner, Head of the Patent Department Firm:BERKEN IP Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina Areas of expertise: Patent drafting and prosecution, cross-border patent strategy, technically complex inventions, patent infringement and validity opinions, freedom-to-operate analyses, patent litigation counselling, IP training and education
A technical foundation shaped early on
Emilio’s route into patent law was shaped by both family influence and technical curiosity. Trained initially as a chemical engineer, he went on to complete a PhD in engineering before studying intellectual property law in Europe, including formal training in France.
Growing up in a household where patents were a regular topic of conversation — with a chemical engineer mother and a lawyer father — gave Emilio early exposure to the intersection between technology and law. While it didn’t immediately appeal, that combination later proved compelling. Particularly as he recognised the opportunity patents offered to work internationally, learn continuously, and engage deeply with innovation and new technologies.
Leading the patent function at BERKEN IP
As Head of the Patent Department at BERKEN IP, Emilio oversees all patent-related work at the firm. His role spans team leadership, technical supervision, strategic decision-making, and client communication, including the preparation of patent infringement and freedom-to-operate opinions, as well as strategic counselling in patent litigation matters, acting as the main interface between inventors, foreign associates and the firm’s legal and paralegal internal team.
Day to day, his focus is firmly technical. He works closely with the firm’s patent attorneys on drafting applications, responding to office actions, and shaping prosecution strategies and cooperates with the firm’s legal team specialized in technology contracts, litigation and enforcement. Administrative and formalities work is handled by a specialized team, allowing the technical team to concentrate on substantive patent matters.
Emilio also remains hands-on with his own cases, often reserving quieter periods of the day to work directly on complex files that require deeper technical attention.
A European-style approach in a Latin American context
One of the defining features of Emilio’s practice is his deliberate adoption of a European-style patent model within the Argentine system. While Argentina’s patent law itself draws heavily from European traditions, much of the local market is dominated by incoming foreign filings, with limited emphasis on drafting or strategic development.
Many firms, Emilio explains, are lawyer-led and focus primarily on procedural prosecution. By contrast, BERKEN IP has built a team of engineers and scientists who are trained to engage directly with inventors, draft applications from scratch, and think strategically about claim scope and future amendments.
This approach allows the firm to work closely with Argentine innovators from the earliest stages of development, rather than only entering the process once an application already exists.
Why technical training matters more than ever
For Emilio, strong technical training is fundamental to good patent work. It builds trust with clients, particularly inventors, who want reassurance that their ideas are fully understood and accurately represented.
As technologies become more complex and prior art landscapes more crowded, that technical grounding becomes even more critical. Patentability increasingly turns on small but meaningful distinctions, especially for incremental innovations. Understanding those distinctions — and how to defend them — requires more than legal knowledge alone.
Emilio also believes it is generally easier to teach patent law to engineers than to teach advanced engineering concepts to lawyers, particularly in a system where obtaining a technical degree can be lengthy and demanding.
Training the next generation of patent attorneys
Emilio personally oversees much of the in-house training at BERKEN IP. New technical team members begin with a broad grounding in intellectual property law, covering patents, trade marks and designs, to ensure they understand the wider IP context and client needs.
From there, training becomes increasingly patent-specific. Topics such as novelty, inventive step and priority are explored through real examples and practical exercises, encouraging critical thinking rather than rote learning.
This mirrors Emilio’s approach to teaching at university, where he focuses on helping students learn to develop critical thinking and to how to ask the right questions — a skill he sees as essential for both researchers and patent attorneys.
Adding value across borders
BERKEN IP’s technical approach also strengthens its relationships with foreign clients and associates. Having experience drafting applications themselves allows Emilio and his team to engage more meaningfully with prosecution strategies, suggest technically sound amendments, and adapt arguments across jurisdictions. This technical depth also supports the preparation of infringement, validity and freedom-to-operate opinions, and provides a solid foundation for advising on patent disputes and litigation strategies.
Their familiarity with practices in Europe, the US and elsewhere enables them to explain where Argentine requirements differ — and where flexibility exists — helping clients navigate cross-border portfolios more efficiently, both in prosecution and in litigation contexts.
By carrying out much of the technical work locally, the firm is also able to manage costs more effectively for Argentine clients while maintaining international standards.
Academia, communication and clarity
Alongside his legal practice, Emilio has maintained a long-standing academic role, teaching engineering subjects at university. His research background helps him understand the pressures researchers face, particularly around publishing and timing patent filings.
This dual perspective allows him to act as a bridge between inventors and business stakeholders, balancing scientific urgency with legal protection. It has also shaped his communication style — something clients frequently remark on — enabling him to explain complex patent systems in clear, accessible terms.
An international outlook
Active involvement in the global IP community is central to Emilio’s work. He regularly attends international conferences and participates in professional committees. Seeing this as essential both for staying current and for building trusted working relationships.
For a firm based in Argentina, this global engagement also signals reliability to overseas clients. Many of whom rely on BERKEN IP to coordinate filings across Latin America and beyond.
Life beyond IP
Outside the office, Emilio enjoys travelling, often extending work trips to explore new cities. Languages are another passion, and he is currently learning Mandarin, both for the challenge and the cultural insight it offers.
Music plays a significant role in his life. A trained violinist, Emilio continues to play for pleasure. Finding it a welcome contrast to the technical demands of patent work. His partner is a professional classical pianist, and performing or listening to music together provides a creative outlet beyond the legal world.
Looking ahead
Emilio believes the Argentine patent profession is likely to evolve towards a more technically focused model. Particularly as startups and inventor-led companies become more prominent and seek international protection.
For engineers and scientists considering a move into patent law, his advice is clear: technical skills are essential, but legal training, communication, client-oriented service, teamwork and curiosity matter just as much.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
Nidhi Anand is a Partner at Chadha & Chadha, leading the firm’s Bangalore and Hyderabad offices. With a background in biotechnology, she advises clients across life sciences and pharmaceuticals on patent drafting, prosecution, oppositions and portfolio strategy, bringing a people-centric and insight-led approach to leadership and IP practice.
Quick profile
Areas of expertise: Biotechnology and life sciences, patent drafting and prosecution, oppositions, portfolio strategy, IP leadership and mentoring
Nidhi’s path into intellectual property was not a carefully mapped plan but a gradual realisation that patents could play a powerful role beyond the laboratory. Early in her biotechnology training, an article shared by her father about a biopharmaceutical company using patents to scale affordable insulin production left a lasting impression. It reframed patents as tools that could balance innovation, access and fairness.
That early curiosity stayed with her. Drawn to problem-solving and understanding how complex systems work, she found that IP aligned naturally with her strengths. Over the past 14 years, that alignment has shaped her practice, allowing her to move from the lab into a profession where scientific depth meets real-world impact.
Leading with trust and perspective
Nidhi describes her leadership style as people-centric rather than hierarchical. For her, effective leadership is rooted in presence, clarity and empowerment. Creating an environment where expectations are clear and collaboration feels natural allows individuals to perform at their best.
She places particular emphasis on long-term development over short-term output. By encouraging ownership and independent thinking, while remaining available as a mentor, she aims to help teams grow not only as professionals but as individuals.
Finding reward in strategy and growth
Nidhi remains closely involved across the full spectrum of patent work, from drafting and prosecution to oppositions and portfolio strategy. What has evolved over time is her perspective on that work. Increasingly, she finds fulfilment in building client trust, contributing to firm growth and shaping portfolios that are robust and forward-looking.
Portfolio strategy, in particular, stands out as especially rewarding. It allows her to connect technical detail with commercial insight, helping clients strengthen their positions in a way that is thoughtful, fair and sustainable, while also supporting the broader direction of the firm.
Advising across a changing life sciences landscape
Working in biotechnology, life sciences and pharmaceuticals means operating in sectors that are both complex and fast-moving. Recent years have seen a rise in litigation around biosimilars and biologics, requiring careful navigation of biologics patents, data exclusivity gaps and trade secret protection. At the same time, AI-driven diagnostics and digital health tools have introduced new uncertainties around patentability under Indian law.
Advising such a diverse client base, from start-ups to multinational companies, demands flexibility. For start-ups, Nidhi focuses on clarity, accessibility and prioritisation, helping founders decide what needs protection now and what can wait. For multinationals, the emphasis shifts to refining mature strategies, pressure-testing positions and occasionally offering a contrarian view to strengthen decision-making. Across both, trust and clear communication remain constant.
India’s evolving IP ecosystem
Over the last decade, Nidhi has seen significant progress in India’s IP framework. Improvements at the Indian Patent Office, including digitisation and more predictable examination practices, have increased confidence in prosecution outcomes. The establishment of dedicated IP Divisions within the High Courts has also strengthened enforcement and aligned Indian jurisprudence more closely with international standards.
These changes have allowed advisors to move beyond procedural navigation and focus more on portfolio quality, enforcement readiness and long-term value. Collaboration across Chadha & Chadha’s offices plays a central role here, ensuring that every matter benefits from shared knowledge, consistent quality standards and the firm’s collective experience.
Learning, mentoring and paying it forward
Staying connected to training and knowledge-sharing is both professionally grounding and personally motivating for Nidhi. Preparing for lectures and mentoring sessions gives her space to step back, revisit fundamentals and engage with emerging issues. At heart, she remains deeply curious.
Mentoring, however, carries a deeper responsibility. Having benefited from being trusted with responsibility early in her own career, she now aims to strike the same balance for others, offering stretch opportunities alongside guidance. For her, training and mentoring are integral to practice, reinforcing a culture of learning and mutual value creation for the team and the firm.
Experience as a woman in IP
Since entering the profession in 2012, Nidhi’s experience as a woman in IP has been shaped by an inclusive environment. With women making up a significant proportion of leadership at her firm, competence and judgment take precedence over gender. This has allowed her to focus on building technical depth, client trust and mentoring the next generation.
While the profession continues to evolve, she sees the trajectory as positive. The increasing adoption of flexible career structures and well-designed re-entry pathways, refelcts a broader recognition that diverse career stages can coexist with long-term professional growth in IP for women.
Switching off
Outside of work, Nidhi values time with family and close friends. Simple pleasure such as shared meals, board games and converation provide an opportunity to unwind and recharge.
Looking ahead
Reflecting on her journey, Nidhi emphasises the importance of technical depth, curiosity and adaptability for today’s IP practitioners, particularly in high-tech and biotech fields. As emerging technologies such as AI, quantum computing and synthetic biology reshape patent landscapes, she believes thoughtful strategy, sound judgment and clear communication will matter more than ever. For those willing to invest in learning and take ownership of their work, IP remains a profession where experience compounds and impact grows over time.
Meet the IP Professional is a PatWorld interview series exploring the people and perspectives shaping the intellectual property profession. Discover more interviews in the Meet the IP Professional hub, and find out more about PatWorld — a global IP search provider working with IP professionals worldwide to support informed patent, design and trade mark decisions — on our About Us page.
After a long career spanning private practice, in house support, training and even maternity services advocacy, Debbie has launched Granta IP, a consultancy that gives her the balance and autonomy she wants at this stage of life. She explains that she is not retiring but reshaping how she works so she can stay engaged in the profession on her own terms.
Granta IP brings together her strengths in IP management for small and growing businesses and her technical experience as a patent attorney. She enjoys the contrast, the structured focus of drafting and office actions alongside the broader strategic work of building good IP processes from the ground up.
From Australia to the UK, Learning to Adapt
Debbie spent fourteen years working in Western Australia before returning to the UK. Her client base may have shifted slightly, but the essential lesson remained the same, adapt to the needs of the business in front of you. Working with small companies that had limited understanding of IP taught her the value of meeting clients where they are and building systems that fit their reality.
Helping Businesses Avoid the IP Catch Up Problem
One issue she sees regularly is small companies leaving IP management until it becomes a problem. When portfolios expand without clear processes, it becomes harder to piece everything together later. At Granta IP, Debbie helps organisations get ahead of this by identifying their IP early, setting up workable systems and supporting in house teams who need extra capacity or guidance.
Supporting the Next Generation Through CIPA
Education is a major theme in Debbie’s career. She has taught, written and developed training materials, and now chairs the CIPA Education Committee. She is currently involved in IPReg’s wide ranging review of professional training and in developing apprenticeships as an accessible route into the profession. For her, seeing people grow in confidence is one of the most rewarding parts of the job.
Preparing for an AI Enabled Future
With AI entering the IP workflow, Debbie believes strong foundational skills matter more than ever. Tools can help with early drafting, but only if attorneys know how to evaluate and refine the output. She stresses the importance of critical thinking, client understanding and judgement, qualities no system can replace.
Beyond IP, Dance and Social History
Outside work, Debbie has two enduring passions, dance and family and social history. Although she once considered stage school, today she dances for fun, Latin, hip hop and fitness-based classes. She also spends time researching family history, uncovering stories that span miners, missionaries, textile workers and relatives across Europe, South America and Africa.
Looking Ahead
As she builds Granta IP and contributes to the future of professional education, Debbie’s focus remains the same, stay curious, stay adaptable and keep giving back. Her path has not been linear, but every stage has shaped the professional she is today, and she brings all of it into the work she now does with clients and colleagues.
About Granta IP
Granta IP Services Ltd is a UK-based consultancy providing practical patent, trademark and design protection for innovators, SMEs and growing businesses. Founded by an experienced Chartered Patent Attorney Debbie Slater, the firm blends technical expertise with hands-on industry insight to help clients secure and manage their IP as they scale. Granta IP delivers clear, flexible strategies that strengthen innovation, support commercial growth and ensure ideas are protected from the start.
At PatWorld, we’re proud to support IP firms like Granta IP with comprehensive patent search and intelligence services. From prior art and freedom-to-operate searches to competitor and landscape analysis, our tools help attorneys and their clients make informed, strategic decisions — saving time and improving the strength of every patent application. Get in touch with us today to learn how we can assist with your next project.
With more than four decades as a dual-qualified Chartered Patent Attorney and Chartered Trade Mark Attorney, Keith Loven, founder of Loven Patents & Trademarks in Lincolnshire, has built a reputation for frank, business-focused IP advice that prioritises the client’s commercial interests over billable hours. In a recent conversation, Keith reflected on his career journey, the evolving needs of SME clients, and why early, honest guidance remains the cornerstone of his practice.
From chemical engineering to a lifelong IP career
Keith’s route into intellectual property was far from planned. After studying chemical engineering at the University of Birmingham, he quickly realised that a career with large oil companies held little appeal, partly, he admits with a smile, due to the “bit of a hippie thing” prevalent at the time.
A university jobs brochure changed everything. A friend pointed out an advert for a London firm of patent agents. One rejection later, a second application succeeded, and Keith found himself in a small London office wondering what he had let himself in for.
What hooked him was the blend of skills the job demanded: technical understanding (his chemical engineering background proved surprisingly broad and useful), precision with language, and an introduction to the legal world. “Chemical engineering gave me the basics of mechanical, electrical and civil engineering too,” he explains. “When an inventor starts talking, I can usually say ‘yes, I understand the fundamentals’, that builds confidence straight away.”
SME needs: the impact of Brexit and beyond
Over 40 years, Keith has watched SME requirements shift, often driven by external forces rather than changes in the businesses themselves. The creation of the European Patent system and, for a time, frictionless EU trade encouraged many smaller UK exporters to seek broader protection. Brexit reversed that trend sharply.
“For smaller clients, exporting became harder and more expensive,” Keith notes. “Many have refocused almost entirely on the UK market. It’s not been a positive development for most of them.”
Despite political and legislative upheavals, core SME needs remain constant: affordable protection that adds genuine value and, crucially, advice they can trust.
The importance of saying “don’t file”
Loven Patents & Trademarks has long been known for telling clients when not to pursue an application, advice that is rare in some quarters.
“If there’s no commercial advantage in filing a patent or registering a trade mark, I’ll say so,” Keith states. “Clients quickly learn that we’re not just trying to sell services. That honesty builds trust, some clients have stayed with me for 25 or 30 years because they know I’ll give them the advice that’s right for their business, not mine.”
Common (and costly) pitfalls
Keith regularly sees clients arrive in crisis having launched products without basic freedom-to-operate checks. A recurring theme in recent years is UK sellers sourcing goods from platforms such as Alibaba, reassured by suppliers that “everything is fine”, only to face infringement claims weeks later.
“A little research upfront saves a lot of tears later,” he says. “Naivety isn’t an excuse when cease-and-desist letters land.”
Building long-term relationships in the SME space
Transparency on costs and options is central to Keith’s approach. “I lay out the routes forward, the pros, cons and likely costs. Clients hate surprises, so we try to eliminate them.” He also pushes businesses to think strategically: where does IP fit into the broader plan? How will it add value in three or five years’ time?
Global networks built on trust
Strong relationships with overseas attorneys are vital. “You work with people you trust to do excellent work at sensible cost,” Keith explains. “Reciprocal arrangements exist, but the real value is the mutual help, a quick call to sort a problem without an immediate invoice. Some of those relationships have lasted decades.”
Patents, trade marks and the bigger picture
When a client arrives with “a great invention” that isn’t actually patentable, Keith’s role shifts to holistic strategy: registered designs, powerful branding, or sometimes just disciplined commercial execution.
“A strong brand can protect you even when technical IP can’t,” he points out. “People assume copies will flood the market the moment they launch. Often the bigger challenge is getting anyone to notice the product in the first place.”
Giving back through CIPA
Now Chair of CIPA’s Small Practice Committee and a member of its Council and Internal Governance Committee, Keith has a deeper appreciation of the profession’s representative work.
“For years I was out in Lincolnshire, getting my CPD points and little else. Becoming involved showed me everything CIPA does behind the scenes, shaping policy, supporting members, and giving [KL1] patent attorneys a voice.” His current focus is two-way communication: helping sole practitioners and small firms understand the benefits CIPA delivers while feeding their specific concerns back to the Institute.
Looking ahead: AI and the SME challenge
Asked about the next five years, Keith highlights artificial intelligence as the dominant theme.
“Large companies are already blanketing AI-related technologies with patents. SMEs will increasingly have to navigate that crowded landscape, and avoid assuming that adding ‘with AI’ suddenly makes something inventive.”
Still enjoying the craft
After more than 40 years, what keeps Keith engaged? “It’s still fun,” he laughs. “Solving tricky examination objections, finding the argument that turns a refusal into a grant, there’s real satisfaction in that. And of course the occasional ‘thank you’ when a client realises you’ve saved them time and money.”
Outside work, grandchildren, a never-ending battle with the garden, and decades of family-history research (“they’re all peasants, no aristocrats in sight”) keep him occupied.
As Keith prepares to hand over more day-to-day responsibility to the next generation at Loven Patents & Trademarks, his core philosophy remains unchanged: give honest, commercially grounded advice as early as possible, and never be afraid to tell a client when not to file. It’s an approach that has served both him and thousands of UK innovators remarkably well for over four decades.
About Loven IP
Lincolnshire-based and founder-focused, LOVEN Patents & Trademarks delivers patent strategies, trademark and design protection, and IP-portfolio management for innovators, inventors and brands across the UK and beyond. Established in 1989, the firm combines technical know-how and legal expertise to help clients lock in their inventions, designs and brand identity — ensuring ideas stay protected as the business grows. LOVEN partners with SMEs, inventors and larger organisations to craft robust IP that underpins innovation, commercialisation and long-term value.
At PatWorld, we’re proud to support IP firms like Loven IP with comprehensive patent search and intelligence services. From prior art and freedom-to-operate searches to competitor and landscape analysis, our tools help attorneys and their clients make informed, strategic decisions — saving time and improving the strength of every patent application. Get in touch with us today to learn how we can assist with your next project.
Patent searches can help you assess whether an invention is truly novel and inventive, determine whether you’re free to make and sell your product, understand who else is active in your technology area, and even challenge the strength of an existing patent.
For example:
If you’ve invented a new type of wearable sensor, a combined patent and non-patent literature search — including technical papers, product manuals, and online disclosures — can reveal whether similar technology has already been described. This helps you assess novelty and inventiveness before filing a patent application.
If you’re designing a new kitchen gadget, a search can show whether similar mechanisms have already been patented — and whether you can safely sell yours without infringing someone else’s rights.
If a competitor is blocking you with a patent, a targeted search can uncover earlier documents that may weaken or invalidate their claim.
In short, patent searches offer clarity at every stage of innovation — helping you make informed decisions, reduce risk, and move forward with confidence.
Types of Patent Search
There are several important reasons to carry out a patent search — and they’re more strategic than many people realise.
1. To check if your invention is new and inventive enough to patent If someone else has already described your idea, or if it lacks inventiveness, your patent application may not be considered novel or inventive. A novelty or patentability search helps you understand whether filing is worthwhile — or whether the idea needs refining before you proceed.
2. To assess freedom to operate Just because your invention is new and inventive doesn’t necessarily mean you are free to sell it. Someone else may hold a patent covering a key aspect of your product. A Freedom-to-Operate (FTO), Infringement or Clearance search identifies patents you might infringe.
3. To monitor competitors and industry trends Staying informed about IP activity in your field helps you make smarter decisions. Who is patenting what? What technologies are emerging? Searches such as State-of-the-Art and Patent Watching help you track this.
4. To evaluate the strength or validity of an existing patent If you’re being challenged, blocked, or threatened by another patent holder, an Invalidity Search (also known as a Patent Busting search) can identify prior art that may weaken or invalidate their patent. This is particularly important when your business is at risk due to someone else’s IP rights.
PatWorld offers all of these search types — and more — through our tailored search services.
What does a patent search look like?
Here’s a simple breakdown:
Define the scope of the invention — what it is, how it works, what’s unique
Conduct the search — using specialist worldwide databases and expert querying
Review the results — identifying and categorising relevant documents
Interpret the findings — understanding risks, opportunities, and next steps
At PatWorld, our global searching covers all major jurisdictions including the UK, EU, US, Canada, Australia, China, Japan, and beyond.
When should you get a patent search?
Here are the key moments:
Before filing a patent application To check novelty and inventiveness and avoid wasted drafting or filing costs.
Before launching, manufacturing, importing, or exporting a product To help assess freedom to operate and reduce infringement risk.
When entering a new market or technology area To understand the IP landscape.
If you’re being attacked, threatened, or blocked by another patent An Invalidity Search can uncover prior art that challenges or weakens that patent.
When investing in or purchasing a patent To confirm its strength and validity.
Why choose PatWorld?
Expert search professionals trained by former patent examiners
Flexible search packages for different budgets and needs
Global coverage across all major patent jurisdictions
Clear, user-friendly reports that highlight the most relevant findings
Strict confidentiality for your ideas and product information
PatWorld does not offer legal advice. However, we work closely with qualified and experienced patent attorneys who can interpret search results, advise on legal strategy, and guide you through next steps such as filing, defending, or challenging patents.
If you’d like help choosing the right search, just let us know — we’re here to support your innovation journey.
With a career spanning private practice, in-house leadership, and now consultancy, Emily Teesdale has developed a deep appreciation for how intellectual property (IP) strategy underpins commercial success. Today, through her own consultancy Pivot IP, Emily helps engineering and technology businesses navigate the complex IP landscape — ensuring that protection, collaboration, and opportunity go hand in hand.
A career combining engineering and law
Emily’s path into intellectual property began with a degree in aerospace engineering and a love of technology. “I wanted to find a way to combine my technical background with something broader,” she explains. “Becoming a patent attorney allowed me to do exactly that.” Over the next 18 years, she worked in private practice with clients of all sizes, gaining experience across a wide range of technologies. Her expertise later took her in-house — first with Airbus, where she became heavily involved in collaboration projects, and then into a Head of IP role at another global aerospace company. “In that role, I was responsible for the IP terms across every kind of contract you can imagine,” Emily recalls. “I was also raising IP awareness across the business and managing a portfolio team. It was a fantastic opportunity to see how IP strategy really works at every level.” After more than two decades in demanding corporate roles, Emily took some well-earned time off to travel — a journey that would ultimately inspire the creation of Pivot IP.
A practical approach to IP strategy
When Emily returned from her travels, she wanted to use her experience to help other businesses make sense of IP in a way that was practical, strategic, and aligned to their goals. “At Pivot IP, I effectively act as Head of IP to engineering companies on a consultancy basis,” she explains. “That means helping them navigate the IP landscape in the way that’s best for them and their objectives — whether that’s advising a start-up on early IP steps, negotiating a collaboration agreement, or unpicking a complex issue to find a pragmatic solution.” It’s an approach that reflects Emily’s view of what IP strategy really means. “Any good strategy should maximise opportunities and minimise risks,” she says. “From an IP perspective, that means reducing exposure to risks like patent infringement or misuse of confidential information, while using the IP system to create and protect opportunities. It’s about far more than just obtaining patents or trade marks — it’s about embedding IP thinking into every aspect of the business.”
Recognition and collaboration
Earlier this year, Emily was recognised as a Notable Practitioner by IP Stars, a distinction that carries particular meaning. “It honestly means so much — especially as it came just six months after setting up Pivot IP,” she says. “When you’re working independently, you don’t always have the encouragement that comes from being part of a big team, so this recognition was a real boost. It’s also an honour to know that my work — which is rather different to the traditional patent attorney role — is valued.” Emily also collaborates closely with Iain Russell of Russell IP, where she provides consultancy support alongside her own practice. “I love working with Iain and am very grateful for his support,” she says. “My work there includes providing IP strategy advice and helping clients understand what to prioritise. I also still enjoy getting involved in drafting and prosecution work — it keeps me more connected to the technical side of things.”
Making IP strategy work in practice
For Emily, helping businesses develop a strong IP strategy begins with understanding where they are and where they want to go. “It’s essential to know what assets they already have, the industry landscape they are in and what their commercial objectives are,” she explains. “Only then can you design a strategy that supports those goals.”
She also highlights the importance of IP awareness and education within organisations. “You don’t always need a big budget to improve your IP position. Building awareness among employees about what to protect, what not to disclose, and when to raise potential risk issues is one of the most effective steps a company can take.”
A key part of her role involves helping clients navigate the practical realities of IP — often under pressure. Emily recalls one instance where a careful review of collaboration terms completely changed the outcome for her client. “I reviewed the IP clauses of a potential collaboration and realised they wouldn’t give my client the access they needed once the development project ended,” she explains. “It meant going back to senior management, explaining why the terms had to change, and renegotiating them at a late stage. It was challenging, but ultimately the new agreement ensured that when the technology is commercialised, my client can move forward with a secure and effective supply chain, even if the collaboration partner doesn’t proceed.”
It’s an example that perfectly captures Emily’s approach — balancing technical insight with commercial foresight. “Patent searches and freedom-to-operate analyses also play a crucial role,” she adds. “These are vital tools to understand where you sit in the IP landscape around you. Only when you know where you are can you plan where you’re going.”
The global dimension of collaboration
Having worked extensively in the aerospace sector, Emily understands that innovation today is rarely confined to one country or organisation. “Increased global collaboration is a great thing. It allows more companies to develop technology together, particularly in emerging cross-sector areas,” she explains. “But with that comes the need to ensure your IP protection reflects the global nature of your work, that your contracts are aligned across jurisdictions, and that you’re partnering with the right organisations.”
Life beyond IP
When she’s not advising clients or speaking on IP strategy, Emily loves to explore the world — quite literally. She has visited more than 70 countries, with New Zealand, Costa Rica and Japan among her favourites. “Discovering new places, especially through food, is a real joy” she says. “I love dining out and experiencing different cultures that way. I also enjoy dancing and spending time with animals — not the most compatible combination, perhaps!”
Her travels have brought some unforgettable experiences. “Getting a helicopter onto Fox Glacier in New Zealand and scrambling through the ice caves was incredible,” Emily recalls. “And volunteering at an animal sanctuary in Namibia, where I helped feed baby baboons, was truly special.” She laughs when recalling another of her adventures — hiking the Inca Trail to Machu Picchu. “Mainly for Machu Picchu itself rather than the four-day hike! I’m not much of a camper, but the porters and chefs were incredible and made the experience truly memorable.”
The value of effective IP strategy
Emily sums up the importance of IP strategy simply but powerfully. “An effective and well-implemented IP strategy enables a business to achieve — and often exceed — its objectives,” she says. “Whether it’s growth, attracting investment, or increasing valuation, the right IP approach provides the foundation for long-term success.”
Emily also works with Iain Russell at Russell IP, providing IP strategy consultancy and patent support.
At PatWorld, we’re proud to support IP professionals like Emily. Our comprehensive patent search and intelligence reports help inform freedom-to-operate, state-of-the-art, and competitor landscape decisions. By providing accurate and timely data, we help attorneys and consultants worldwide strengthen their clients’ IP strategies and unlock greater commercial value. Get in touch with us today to learn how we can assist with your next project.
When Potter Clarkson decided to establish a presence in Denmark, the goal was ambitious — to grow a local team that could bring world-class IP expertise to one of Europe’s most dynamic innovation hubs. At the heart of that mission stands Camilla Kiørboe, Partner at the Copenhagen office, whose leadership and vision have transformed a start-up-sized team into one of the firm’s most cohesive and respected groups.
From Science and Law to Real-World Impact
Camilla’s career was born from a fascination with the intersection of science and law
and a desire to help ideas evolve from concept to commercial success.
“I’ve always been drawn to the interface between science and law,” she explains. “What inspires me most is seeing innovation grow into something that makes a tangible difference in the world.”
That passion continues to drive her work today, whether advising start-ups or collaborating with international clients in Denmark’s thriving innovation ecosystem.
Growing Copenhagen from the Ground Up
Camilla joined Potter Clarkson shortly after the Copenhagen office opened its doors, with a mission to establish a robust platform for growth and build the firm’s profile in Denmark.
“Our goal from the outset was to create a strong local presence that offered more than just an office, we wanted to introduce a full-service approach that combines legal depth with technical understanding,” she says.
Seven years on, the office has expanded from two to eight professionals, combining organic growth with a shared sense of purpose. That growth reflects the wider strategic ambition to offer innovators something different — a team that not only protects ideas but actively helps clients unlock their commercial potential.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration and Trust
Much of the Copenhagen office’s success, Camilla believes, lies in the people.
“We’ve focused on bringing in people who genuinely enjoy working together,” she explains. “We’re transparent about our goals, our responsibilities and our challenges. This openness builds trust and keeps friction low even when deadlines are tight.”
Camilla and her team prioritise both technical excellence and personal development. Each team member is encouraged to grow beyond their legal expertise, building confidence in business development and industry engagement.
“We see our people as whole individuals with potential beyond the law,” she adds. This is what makes our team dynamic and resilient.”
Denmark’s Innovation Hotspot
Camilla’s enthusiasm for Denmark’s innovation landscape is palpable.
“We’re a small country, but the level of innovation here is remarkable,” she says. “In areas like life science, green tech, biosolutions, biotech, foodtech, clean tech and agritech, Denmark is a global leader.”
She highlights the strong collaboration between universities, incubators and industry as a key driver of this success given it is an environment where groundbreaking ideas quickly find commercial pathways.
Championing Start-Ups and SMEs
A significant part of Camilla’s work involves supporting start-ups and SMEs as they turn R&D breakthroughs into viable businesses.
“We help founders understand the value of their IP and how to communicate it effectively when seeking investment,” she explains. “It’s incredibly rewarding to see those early-stage ideas grow into thriving companies.”
While Camilla has extensive experience of working with investors and businesses of all sizes including some of the largest and best-known names in European biotech and biosolutions, her passion for entrepreneurial clients is growing.
“SMEs and start-ups are very close to my heart. They bring such energy and optimism and those are the ideas that will shape the future.”
Building a Connected Community
Camilla has also built a strong professional network around her areas of expertise, particularly in foodtech, agritech, biosolutions and other areas where microbes play a key role. Through mentoring, coaching, judging innovation competitions and writing thought leadership pieces, she actively contributes to Denmark’s innovation community.
“I try to work in these areas, not just for them,” she says. “It’s a personal interest as much as a professional one.”
A Strategic Vision for the Future
Looking ahead, Camilla is focused on expanding the Copenhagen office’s expertise to include more digital and engineering-based innovation whilst continuing to strengthen collaboration across Potter Clarkson’s European network.
“Our next step is to grow our capabilities in new technical areas,” she says. “We’re lucky to have great support from our colleagues across offices, but having local expertise on the ground makes all the difference.”
Leading with Trust and Direction
Asked what leadership advice has guided her most, Camilla doesn’t hesitate:
“Set a clear strategic direction, then trust your team to deliver it. Leadership isn’t about having all the answers; it’s about cultivating a team that can find them together.”
That philosophy has not only shaped her approach to management but has helped define the culture of the Copenhagen office itself.
Recharging in Nature
Outside work, Camilla finds balance in the great outdoors.
“My family and I love spending time in nature — hiking, cycling, running, paddleboarding, skiing, scuba diving and even fishing,” she shares. “We travel a lot and love adventures. At home, we have a California van that we use for exploring whenever we can. Being outside in nature inspires and recharges me. It also reminds me why it’s so important to find solutions that lead to climate-positive innovation and help build a regenerative and sustainable future for generations to come.”
About Potter Clarkson Copenhagen
From its base in Denmark’s innovation capital, Potter Clarkson’s Copenhagen team combines deep technical insight with commercial understanding, helping clients across the Nordic region turn ideas into business advantage.
PatWorld Supporting the IP profession
PatWorld is proud to support patent attorneys like Camilla by offering expert-led patent searches. Our experienced patent search analysts deliver tailored, high-quality results to help IP professionals make informed decisions and add value for their clients. Check out our search services: Patent Search | Non-Patent Search | All Technologies
Interested in being featured in our Meet the IP Professional series? There’s no fee to take part—you’ll help inform readers about IP and raise your professional profile. Get in touch with our editor, Sue Leslie at [email protected].
From mobile communications research to global IP diplomacy, Daniel Chew’s career has been shaped by curiosity, connection, and commercial instinct. Now a partner at HLK and Chair of CIPA’s International Liaison Committee, his story is one of strategic thinking and a passion for building strong relationships – across borders, across professions, and across generations.
From PhD to Patent Attorney
Daniel Chew’s path to the patent profession began with an invention. During the first year of his PhD in mobile communications at the University of Surrey, Daniel was preparing to publish a breakthrough in a scientific journal, only to find the university blocked the submission in favour of filing a patent.
“I was frustrated,” he admits, “I just wanted to publish. I had no idea what a patent was, let alone that it could be licensed.” Fast forward a couple of years, and Daniel returned home one day to find a cheque and a letter telling him the university had licensed his patent. Shortly afterwards, the licensee offered him a job, an opportunity he accepted, though only briefly. Determined to pursue a career in the patent profession, he soon moved on. It was the beginning of a journey that would shape his future in Intellectual Property.
Building a Career on His Own Terms
Daniel’s early experiences shaped a mindset that would define his professional approach: one of independence, ambition, and a clear-eyed focus on business development. “I realised quite early on that in private practice, many attorneys inherit clients from retiring partners. I didn’t want to spend my career working only on other people’s clients.”
Determined to build his own practice, Daniel began networking as a trainee, attending events, building connections, and investing time after hours to grow his pipeline. “We talk a lot about the importance of client service, but when you’re the one making promises to new clients, you feel a real responsibility to deliver. That changes how you approach everything.”
After gaining experience at two other London based firms, Daniel joined HLK, where he quickly established his own client base. Before long, nearly all his work came from relationships he had built himself. He’s at his best when out meeting clients or on the conference circuit, listening, learning, and understanding what really drives their business. That hands-on approach, coupled with an instinct for connection, has become his hallmark and one of the keys to his success as a patent attorney.
Business Development as a Mindset
Daniel is a passionate advocate for embedding business development (BD) into the culture of IP firms. “It shouldn’t be something people only do for career progression. It should be a natural part of working in professional services. If you don’t have a network, you don’t have prospects. If you don’t have prospects, you can’t build a practice.”
“Business development takes practice, patience, confidence and resilience. The more you do, the more satisfying it becomes to give our clients the best. Afterall, it’s all about helping clients succeed.”
He’d like to see BD skills offered more formally, particularly to early-career professionals. “Whether you’re in-house or in private practice, soft skills like networking and relationship-building are essential,” he explains.
“At HLK, our attorneys are trained with these client relationships at an early stage in their careers,” he adds. “They continue to build on these skills by working closely with in-house teams, so that together we operate as one highly effective team.”
A President with Global Perspective
It was Daniel’s extensive international network, built through years of active engagement and collaboration within the IP community, that positioned him for his appointment as President of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) in 2023, making him the first person of Asian heritage to hold the role. “When I was first approached, I thought it was madness – I was in the middle of growing a busy practice. But I realised I could use my network to help promote CIPA globally.”
During his term, Daniel focused on raising CIPA’s international profile, connecting with sister organisations, patent offices, and industry leaders. One highlight was a meeting with then USPTO Director Kathi Vidal, whose energy and commitment to emerging technologies and diversity left a lasting impression.
He also undertook international missions across the USA and Asia, representing CIPA at major IP events and fostering collaborations that strengthened the UK’s standing in the global IP community.
Strengthening the UK’s Voice Post-Brexit
Now Chair of CIPA’s International Liaison Committee, Daniel continues to ensure the UK profession remains visible and competitive on the world stage. A key focus has been demystifying the UK’s continued representation rights before the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which many overseas organisations initially misunderstood post-Brexit.
“The narrative has shifted,” he says. “At first we were explaining that UK-based European Patent Attorneys have rights of representation before the UPC. Now we’re showing that we are actively representing parties before the UPC and doing it well.”
Leadership, Visability and Representation
Daniel made history as CIPA’s first Asian President, a fact he initially found uncomfortable. “I hated it, to be honest. I’ve lived in the UK for 26 years, and it didn’t feel significant to me. But then someone from an ethnic minority background came up to me and said, ‘It made me believe it’s achievable.’ That really changed my view.”
He now sees it as a platform to inspire others and to demonstrate what leadership in the profession can look like.
Advice to Future IP Leaders
Daniel’s advice to young professionals is simple: get involved. “Be open-minded. Go to events. Build a network. You never know who you’ll meet or what opportunity might follow.”
He’s also a strong supporter of engaging with professional bodies. “CIPA has 23 committees – there’s something for everyone. It’s a great way to give back, learn, and build your presence in the profession.”
A Dolphin Trainer in Disguise?
Outside of work, Daniel loves hiking (most recently at Torrey Pines, California) and long walks near his home in St Albans. One of his most memorable business trips? A prospective client cutting straight to the chase: “Daniel, we know why you’re here. Just tell us what you can offer.” He laughs, that directness, he says, was a dream for someone who appreciates straight talking.
And while he once joked that, 21 years ago, back then hardly anyone knew what a patent attorney was, telling people his profession was the “ultimate conversation killer,” he’d instead tell curious strangers at bars that he was a dolphin trainer. Who knows, maybe there’s still time for that second career?
Meet Daniel at APAA 2025
Daniel will be attending the Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA) 2025 Conference in Kuala Lumpur next month. If you’re also planning to be there and would like to connect, feel free to reach out via LinkedIn or say hello at one of the networking sessions.
Daniel is a partner at HLK, a full-service intellectual property firm that helps clients around the world to protect, exploit, and defend their IP rights. HLK combines patent and trademark attorneys with a legal team to deliver strategic, technically informed advice across all sectors of innovation.
PatWorld is proud to support patent attorneys like Daniel by offering expert-led patent searches. Our experienced patent search analysts deliver tailored, high-quality results to help IP professionals make informed decisions and add value for their clients. Check out our search services: Patent Search | Non-Patent Search | All Technologies
Interested in being featured in our Meet the IP Professional series? There’s no fee to take part, and you’ll help inform readers about IP. Get in touch with our editor, Sue Leslie at [email protected].
Within the Bartle household, “being a patent attorney” has long been understood as a playful insult. “It means you’re being pedantic, analytical, contrarian and generally insufferable,” laughs Robin Bartle. “My family seem to think I was just cut out for the job – and they’re probably right.”
It’s an introduction that captures Bartle perfectly: sharp, humorous, and thoughtful in equal measure. As co-founder and director of Bartle Read, a boutique intellectual property firm with offices in Liverpool and London, Robin brings more than twenty years of experience helping clients acquire, maintain, commercialise and enforce patents across mechanical, electrical, electronic and computer-based inventions.
The road to Bartle Read
Robin in his home-built replica of a 1960s sports car.
After two decades in practice, including a long stint as an equity partner, Robin decided it was time to build something of his own. “It was the best decision of my working life, bar none,” he says. “It’s never easy to walk away from a secure position and from colleagues one likes and respects. But there’s something hugely liberating about being able to arrange things just as one wants — especially in terms of how we work with clients. I think at some point in life, a lot of us just want to be our own boss.”
That independence has shaped Bartle Read’s culture ever since. “We’re a small firm with low overheads. That allows us to focus on what matters most: giving honest, practical advice and maintaining close, long-term relationships with clients.”
From LEDs to AI: the evolution of innovation
Across his career, Robin has seen successive waves of technological change transform the work of a patent attorney. “When a new enabling technology comes along, we’re suddenly inundated with projects based on interesting new ways to use it,” he explains. “That happened when LEDs became bright enough for general illumination, or with satellite-based geolocation, Bluetooth®, phone apps — there are many examples.”
Today, he says, the same is happening with artificial intelligence. “At the moment a great proportion of the start-up projects I’m seeing involve new ways of employing AI. It’s exciting because there’s no doubt the world is going to change enormously. There’s real commercial opportunity for organisations creative and determined enough to carve a niche. But it’s also a difficult area in terms of patentability. I worry the UK’s current approach could prove unhelpful to our domestic AI industry.”
The art of argument
Known for his love of intellectual wrangling, Robin has handled a wide range of contentious work — from European oppositions to infringement litigation. His advice to younger attorneys? “Keep calm, prepare meticulously, and never be afraid to give the client a blunt assessment.”
He adds, “The truth is that outcomes in contentious matters are often uncertain. The law presents itself as a coherent system leading to right and wrong answers. However, so much of what we do in IP — like judging whether an invention is ‘obvious’ — is inherently subjective. Two equally skilled judges can look at the same facts and come to opposite conclusions. That’s not a flaw, it’s part of the system. As advisers, we just have to be honest about uncertainty.”
Designs and disputes
Robin also has a particular interest in designs, having co-authored the Community Designs Handbook. “Rights in designs are actually quite limited in scope,” he says. “We see fewer blatant product clones than we did thirty years ago. Although, disputes still arise — often between parties who’ve worked together before. In those cases, unregistered design right can be a very useful tool for bringing a wayward manufacturer to heel.”
Straight talk and sound judgement
Despite the technical nature of his work, Robin believes that most legal issues aren’t as complex as they might seem — provided you’ve done the thinking first. “An adviser’s job is to focus on the questions that matter to the client. Once you’re clear in your own mind what needs to be said, explaining it clearly tends to be easy enough. The tricky conversations are usually the ones where you haven’t quite decided what you think.”
Balancing budgets and business reality
Working with start-ups has given Robin a pragmatic view of IP strategy. “I tend to encourage them to put attracting capital right at the top of the to-do list from day one,” he says. “Usually, patenting costs in the early stages are small compared to what’s needed to get to market. Once investment is secured, decisions about IP spend are rarely difficult. I often tell clients that the happiest projects are the ones spending other people’s money.”
That frankness extends to his advice on priorities: “I’m not someone who thinks IP is always the answer. Many great innovations can’t be patented, and many patents never make money. The key is to understand what job IP is going to do for the business — whether that’s securing funding or deterring competitors — and to plan spending accordingly.”
A philosophy of patience and precision
Asked what he’d tell his younger self, Robin offers an admirably dry answer: “Follow your dreams, young man. Tear up that pinstripe suit and go on the stage!” Then, more seriously: “The life of a patent attorney is ruled by deadlines. Procrastination is the cardinal sin. A retired admiral once told my wife the secret to a happy life was always doing the difficult jobs first — and the older I get, the more I try to observe it.”
Outside the office
When he’s not drafting patent applications or debating inventive step, Robin is most at home in his workshop. “I like making things of all sorts — furniture, toys, prototypes, even a home-built replica of a 1960s sports car,” he says. “Just let me alone in the shed, surrounded by wood or metal shavings with Radio 4 in the background, and I’m a happy man.”
About Bartle Read
Founded by Robin Bartle and David Read, Bartle Read is an independent intellectual property firm with offices in Liverpool and London, offering patent, design and IP enforcement expertise across a wide range of technologies. The firm’s ethos is built on clarity, accessibility and deep technical understanding — values reflected in the way its attorneys work closely with clients to craft practical IP strategies.
At PatWorld, we’re proud to support boutique IP firms like Bartle Read with comprehensive patent search and intelligence services. From prior art and freedom-to-operate searches to competitor and landscape analysis, our tools help attorneys and their clients make informed, strategic decisions — saving time and improving the strength of every patent application. Get in touch with us today to learn how we can assist with your next project.
From Filing to Enforcement: Greg Corcoran’s Approach to Smart IP Management.
Greg Corcoran founded his own practice, Greg Corcoran IP, recently in March 2025 to use his substantial commercial experience, with a clear and thoughtful philosophy: patents are business tools. When developed strategically, they can be used to mitigate risk, unlock commercial opportunity, and give clients the commercial leverage they need to thrive in an increasingly competitive world.
Greg is a European and UK Patent Attorney, UPC Representative and former in-house counsel at one of Europe’s leading technology companies. Today, he works directly with clients to support strategic portfolio development and improvement. His practice is rooted in practical experience and built on a foundation of collaboration, commercial insight, and a deep understanding of the full patent lifecycle.
A Pathway to Patents
Greg’s journey into IP law began with a desire to combine a technical background with meaningful client relationships. After early exposure to both scientific research and legal practice, he studied physics at university with the clear intention of training as a solicitor specialising in intellectual property. That plan paid off. He trained at Taylor Joynson Garrett (now Taylor Wessing) where his first experience of patent practice was revocation proceedings before the English High Court.
Greg retrained as a patent attorney in the midst of the dot-com crash in the London office of a national patent attorney firm. Through his training he sought out a more commercially focused role where prosecution decisions were made in context of business objectives. At qualification he realised his goal of securing an in-house role, managing large patent portfolios and providing clearance advice in the context of the company’s business landscape.
Over his seventeen years in-house he worked closely with fellow in-house patent professionals, external counsel, and the company’s engineers – many of whom were the inventors of the patents in the portfolio. Ultimately, he worked with people across the entire business from product architects, colleagues in marketing, and members of the Board. Working as part of a team he needed to ensure that patent claims, for example, aligned to the chosen IP strategy to realise-the business’ real- commercial goals.
“A patent should be more than just a description of a technical solution to a technical problem – it should be prepared so it can have claims relevant for its possible application and commercial leverage in mind.”
A Bridging Practice
At the heart of Greg’s practice is a distinctive approach that brings together three crucial elements: effective drafting, practical in-house experience, and a clear understanding of its strategic use of patents for example in litigation strategy. These pillars have influenced the preparation of the program for the CIPA Congress 2025 which is themed around the intersection of IP and AI and which Greg is chairing this week. He notes that, with the support of CIPA’s current President, Bobby Mukherjee – a leading in-house practitioner – he encouraged each panel session to have an in-house speaker. The program includes a very practical patent drafting session and a UK and UPC judiciary panel session.
“To secure granted claims which a client can leverage to acquire the commercial value they seek, it is crucial to appreciate how your claims would work before a court, even before you put pen to paper and start drafting.”
Through his practice, Greg aims to help clients prepare more robust patents, that do not merely capture the invention which the inventor thinks has been invented, but are also prepared with how the patent may be applied commercially in mind – which may include enforcement. While his business is relatively new, the services which he offers are informed by years of experience both in-house and in private practice. He is actively building a client base that can benefit from this integrated approach.
“Drafting with foresight, advising the business to navigate third party patent landscapes, knowing how in-house teams work, and keeping one eye on how the patent could be used, even in the courtroom – these are the skills which I seek to bring together for my clients.”
Portfolio Improvement: An Underused Commercial Tool?
Portfolio improvement enables clients to achieve more value from their existing assets in the context of the patent landscape of their chosen markets. He works with clients identifying their filings that have potential to offer useful leverage and optimising claim scope in context of competitor positions. This means that he needs to learn about third party patent portfolios, and the client’s markets, not just the client’s own assets. Investment in a portfolio is also an investment in knowledge of the context of the client’s assets. With more knowledge, the more effectively, efficiently and deftly the patents in a patent portfolio may be used. Enhancement of portfolios take time and draws on experience and a strategic approach to IP. Portfolio improvement, he says, can be far more than mitigating the risk of litigation. Even if litigation mitigation is not a primary goal it is a valuable added benefit. A third party may hesitate or wait before using court proceedings, or even seek solely to negotiate, if a target business has invested in its IP position to develop an appropriate patent portfolio. Investment in IP can help mitigate significant costs.
“Whether you’re seeking investment, looking to license out technology, or wanting otherwise to negotiate with a third party, an improved portfolio can be a benefit to your position. A well-developed portfolio informs a third party that you’re prepared with a strategy in mind.”
This proactive approach is particularly relevant in today’s global IP landscape, where pressure on IP budgets meets rising commercial expectations. Use of older filings may serve to achieve patents which can be used to apply leverage against third parties faster and more effectively than fresh filings. Under cost pressures and good timing, improvement work can be targeted, focused and limited.
The Benefits of Litigation Mitigation
Even though clients prefer to avoid talking about litigation, it has to be considered as a part of commercial strategy according to Greg. The positive reception to the UPC since it started in 2023, makes portfolio improvement to mitigate litigation risk even more important and valuable. As we are hearing from leading US practitioners such as David Kappos, an ex-UPTO Director, the UPC is changing the global dominance of the US courts because it is faster, cheaper, and more predictable in its processes and it is also more willing to grant injunctions. Commercial leaders are now describing how these characteristics, especially in view of the size of the UPC’s jurisdiction over eighteen contracting states, often lead to settlement. The risk of a negative decision leading to an injunction can create a commercial predicament for the parties. Information the UPC suggests that the chance of a settlement, in practice, is high.
The reach of the UPC has implications for businesses of all sizes throughout the European market, including SMEs and not just global players. Before the UPC started, a business could rely on the fractured mosaic of different European jurisdictions that would limit the impact of a patent suit usually to one jurisdiction. Those days are numbered if they are not already over. Recent cases of the UPC (and even the German courts) are taking a ‘long-arm approach’ to jurisdictions under special conditions. The enforcement of patents in non-UPC states, such as Spain, or not of the EU, such as the UK, using long-arm jurisdiction, means the reach of the UPC is far further than initially expected.
All business would be advised to invest in their patent position in a prudent manner as part of good business administration. Investment consequently mitigates litigation risk. Traditionally legal fees spent for a litigation are considered as costs that are incurred only when the litigation is under way and thus as a last resort. Funds are spent very quickly following quickly made decisions. Proceedings at the UPC run too fast using this approach, demanding too many resources for a defendant to prepare an adequate defence and respond by preparing and filing its own countersuit. The alternative is to incur some of these costs in advance carefully and strategically over a period of time -such a spending strategy would be an investment. Businesses with an adequate budget could make a long-term investment by starting preparation and mitigation long in advance; yet meaningful results can be achieved with a targeted approach on a limited budget. Yet, as Greg mentioned earlier, such preparations would also improve a patent portfolio and a business’s IP position for the other purposes for example to realise new commercial opportunities.
“Litigation as a business strategy is, after all, a last resort.”
How Greg can Help: Practical, Independent, and In-House-Informed
One of the defining features of Greg’s offering is flexibility. His business’s offering includes services that are designed to plug into existing teams. He offers support to companies which may not have the resources for a full in-house function but still need senior-level strategic input. He offers assistance and advice in the development and implementation of a portfolio strategy, in helping align patent filings with business objectives, and flagging and assisting mitigation of litigation risks.
His experience also allows him to complement rather than compete with other attorneys, bringing an in-house angle and offering a resource to draw on. For example, providing a litigation-informed perspective to drafting and prosecution decisions and offering second opinions that improve the value of a portfolio without escalating cost.
“Predicting which patents of a portfolio will be challenged is a fool’s game; it’s more prudent and cheaper to prepare some of the patents so more of them hold up to scrutiny. I heard a repeating message when I spoke to litigation counsel across Europe in the months before I set up my practice: when their clients present them with their best patents, often only a very small proportion survive scrutiny. Counsel has to use the best patents their clients have – but does it have to be that way, especially now, when so much more can be at stake in Europe?”
Greg also understands the realities of international portfolio management and improvement. Having managed a global portfolio including the US, Europe, and Asia he appreciates the cultural challenges that such work may bring, and the nuances in local practice through engendering long durable relationships with local counsel. He helps clients navigate through such differences that are essential to manage effective communication with external counsel and manage the global IP assets of the client effectively.
A Photographer’s Eye for Detail
Outside the world of patents, Greg is a keen landscape photographer. His brand image is a striking photograph of Belgium’s famous bluebell wood, the Hallerbos. It reflects his international focus and his approach to IP: considered, layered, and aware of how small details contribute to the bigger picture and conversely how the big picture is dependent on the detail within it.
“An image is a whole, but it’s the sum of its parts and the parts make the whole. It’s just like a sound patent portfolio.”
A Favourite Walk?
The Gower Peninsula in Wales – a mix of clifftop paths leading to green rolling countryside, overlooking sheep dotted salt-marshes and empty expansive beaches, through bluebell woods and winding rugged windswept coastal trails. It’s an appropriate metaphor for a career spent exploring new ground while keeping a careful eye on the landscape.
Connect with Greg
Whether you’re a patent attorney, in-house counsel, or an innovator looking to strengthen your IP position, Greg is open to collaboration and conversation. You can learn more about his work and services at https://gregcorcoranip.co.uk or connect with him directly on LinkedIn.
How PatWorld Supports Strategic IP Work
For IP professionals developing commercially focused portfolios – like those Greg helps his clients build – high-quality patent search support can make a real difference. PatWorld’s team of expert analysts deliver tailored search services, including freedom-to-operate, validity, and landscape analysis, helping patent attorneys make confident, informed decisions. For firms looking to strengthen their IP strategies, this kind of insight lays the groundwork for more effective portfolio development and risk mitigation.
At PatWorld, our team of analysts are the engine behind the high-quality searches our clients rely on. This week, we’re spotlighting Geraint James, one of our Senior IP Managers, who has been with us since the very beginning. With over 11 years of experience in patent searching — and a specialism in biotechnology — Geraint is as comfortable navigating the complexities of gene therapies as he is brewing a craft IPA in his garage.
From Biology to Biotech IP
Geraint admits he never had a set career plan. Instead, he followed what fascinated him: “I’ve always chosen subjects I enjoyed — biology and biotechnology — and that naturally led me here.” After studying biology at university, he discovered the world of patent searching almost by accident. But it turned out to be the perfect fit: a role where he could combine his love of science with his analytical mind and endless curiosity about how things work.
The Searcher’s Challenge
Patent searching in biotechnology is anything but straightforward. Geraint explains: “In biotech, you’re dealing with secondary medical use claims, supplementary protection certificates, and terminology that shifts over time. The original patents might not use today’s accepted terms, so you have to think laterally to uncover everything that matters.”
This detective work is what makes his role rewarding. Whether it’s navigating freedom-to-operate searches or helping a client map their competitive landscape, Geraint thrives on finding clarity in complexity.
Supporting Innovators
For Geraint, one of the best parts of the job is working closely with innovators and their attorneys: “Hearing people’s stories is inspiring. Start-ups, in particular, bring so much passion to their inventions. Our searches help them understand the landscape, their competitors, and the opportunities ahead. That insight can make all the difference.”
One standout moment was helping an attorney provide a biotech start-up with a tailored landscape search. The client walked away with a clear view of their competitors — and a strategy for moving forward. “Knowing you’ve played a part in that journey is really rewarding,” he says.
Looking Ahead
Biotech never stands still, and neither does patent searching. Geraint points to gene therapies and CRISPR technologies as areas with enormous potential: “Personalised treatments open up innovative cures we never thought would be possible. It’s an incredibly exciting space.”
At the same time, he recognises the growing challenges posed by AI in IP — from questions of inventorship to the speed at which research is evolving. “It’s going to be one of the defining issues of the next five years,” he notes.
Beyond the Patent Files
When he’s not unravelling biotech patents, Geraint is outdoors with a fishing rod, walking his puppy Roger, or brewing his own beer. He laughs that brewing isn’t so different from his old lab days: sterilising equipment, monitoring yeast, and carefully tracking processes. “It’s all microbiology at the end of the day,” he says — though the end product is much tastier.
His other passions include cooking, cycling, and exploring the Welsh countryside. If he weren’t in IP? Geraint imagines himself as a food writer, a brewer, or even a fishing guide — though he jokes clients would need to sign a waiver promising not to expect too many fish.
Why Geraint Matters at PatWorld
At PatWorld, we believe in putting a face to the searches that underpin vital IP decisions. Geraint’s blend of biotech expertise, curiosity, and people-first approach embodies what makes our team stand out. Behind every report we deliver, there’s someone like Geraint ensuring it’s accurate, insightful, and tailored to the client’s needs.
✅ Next time you read a PatWorld search report, remember: it’s not just data — it’s the result of professionals like Geraint turning complex science into clear answers.
Nathaniel Taylor has built his IP career around solving complex challenges in fast-moving sectors. These include electric vehicles, smart agriculture, and renewable energy systems. As a Director at Keltie and a Chartered and European Patent Attorney, he works closely with clients of all sizes. From high-growth startups to household names, he helps translate engineering ingenuity into strong, strategic IP portfolios.
We spoke to Nathaniel for our Meet the IP Professional series to explore the emerging tech he’s helping protect — and why good IP advice can be the catalyst for growth, agility, and long-term success.
From Engineering Student to IP Strategist
Nathaniel Taylor first encountered intellectual property during an engineering degree project focused on automating parcel-handling systems for Royal Mail. A visiting patent attorney explained how their solutions could be registered and licensed — a lightbulb moment that stuck.
“I realised I was really drawn to the conceptual and problem-solving aspects of engineering, rather than hands-on prototyping and manufacturing,” Nathaniel says. “A traditional engineering career would quickly become detached from any deep technical engagement, while IP offered a way to really stay connected to the core breakthrough technologies.”
That experience laid the foundations for a career focused on guiding innovative technologies through the patent process.
Driving Innovation in the Auto Sector
Nathaniel has worked on the electrification of vehicles at Jaguar Land Rover, which came at a key moment in the industry’s evolution. As the company developed new electric vehicle platforms, he was seconded to their team to harvest inventions and help draft a raft of patent applications directed to motor control systems for off-road performance.
“We were helping protect not just the tech, but the brand identity — preserving what makes JLR distinctive as they transitioned to electric platforms,” he explains.
His work for other automotive clients has included more speculative technologies, such as hydrogen propulsion systems. He helped clients draft patent applications with broad applicability, beyond hydrogen combustion applications, to retain utility even if the commercial interest in the hydrogen applications fell away. In emerging fields like climate tech, where innovation is fast-paced and outcomes are uncertain, he believes IP isn’t just about protection—it’s really about creating options and resilience.
Agri-Tech and the Power of a Strong Patent Portfolio
In the agricultural space, Nathaniel sees IP as a critical asset — particularly for startups navigating acquisition or scale-up. With automation and sensor-driven decision-making transforming farming, many smaller, tech-first firms are attracting interest from legacy players.
“Often, acquisitions are driven not just by talent and know-how, but by the underlying IP that provides a moat against competitive threats. A strong IP portfolio is what gives these companies leverage in negotiations,” Nathaniel says.
His focus is on helping these businesses secure practical protection while also positioning them for future funding and growth.
IP in the Age of Energy Flexibility
Renewable energy is one of the fastest-evolving sectors Nathaniel works in — and staying up to speed is essential. He regularly participates in innovation forums, founder communities, and sector events like London Climate Action Week to understand both technical developments and commercial realities.
One standout trend is the emergence of a diversified energy market that provides a greater variety of financing options for grid ancillary services. There are huge opportunities for companies to innovate and unlock new market opportunities, particularly with AI driving demand for electricity and data processing, Nathaniel expects a surge in IP activity in these areas over the coming years.
“These trends create whole new product categories. And that means opportunities for highly valuable IP.”
Supporting Startups with Practical IP Strategy
Nathaniel works closely with climate tech startups, many of which are navigating early-stage funding challenges and lack deep IP experience. At Keltie, he’s helped build support programmes tailored to these innovators. These include discounted initial services, educational resources, and pro bono partnerships with major law firms.
“We want founders to be empowered, not intimidated. IP isn’t just protection — it’s a growth tool.”
He also notes that the first patent application often serves as a key storytelling tool — something investors will review closely. That’s why clarity, technical accuracy, and commercial alignment all matter when drafting early filings.
Building IP That Can Pivot
Nathaniel believes flexibility is vital — especially for companies working with emerging or speculative technologies. He drafts patent applications with broader applicability, allowing clients to pivot to new sectors or adjacent markets without losing IP coverage.
“Your invention today might not be your business model tomorrow. We try to make sure the IP can evolve with you.”
That approach also helps with long-term licensing and commercial partnerships, where adaptable patent claims can open unexpected opportunities.
Filing with Global Vision
As both a Chartered and European Patent Attorney, Nathaniel brings a wide lens to global IP strategy. The European Patent Office has some of the strictest requirements — particularly around added matter — so he’s well-practised at drafting applications with foresight and jurisdiction-specific nuances.
“We’re always thinking ahead — how will this stand up in the US, UK, or Asia? And how might it need to evolve?”
He also highlights the UK’s 12-month fee-free period as an ideal first filing route for startups looking to make a low-cost but strategic move early on. Meanwhile, understanding key tools like the US grace period helps ensure clients are protected internationally.
What’s Next for IP in Emerging Tech?
Nathaniel sees several areas primed for rapid IP growth over the next 5–10 years:
Grid infrastructure and localised energy supply: IP filings in this space are expected to rise sharply as demand from AI and data centres grows.
Autonomous driving: With telecoms entering the automotive space, expect more IP disputes — but also more licensing and collaboration.
Data-driven agriculture: Large-scale sensor networks and precision farming will drive innovation — and require solid IP foundations.
Each of these trends reflects a broader shift: the convergence of traditional industries with new technologies and new players.
Life Outside the Office
When he’s not drafting claims or reviewing specs, Nathaniel enjoys golf, football, and a surprising new hobby: pottery, inspired by The Great Pottery Throwdown.
“I bought an electric spinning wheel online — slightly questionable wiring, but it’s working so far!”
He also recommends a walk along Bondi Beach in Sydney for stunning views, or a countryside ramble through King’s Langley farmland to the Cart and Horses pub — a personal favourite when visiting his family.
Final Thought: Build IP That Can Pivot With You
Nathaniel’s advice for startups and innovators? Successful IP strategy comes down to clarity, foresight, and agility. This is especially important in emerging sectors where commercial direction can shift rapidly.
“The most successful innovators are the ones prepared to pivot. We help ensure their IP can pivot with them.”
When Lawrence Cullen discusses Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs[i]), he does so with the clarity and passion of someone who has spent decades at the heart of the system—and who still finds it intellectually rewarding. After a distinguished career at the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), where he became one of the UK’s leading experts on SPCs, Lawrence has launched a consultancy to help others navigate the intricacies of life sciences IP.
From Chemistry Labs to IP Policy
Lawrence’s journey into IP began in the lab. Originally from Ireland, he studied industrial chemistry there at the University of Limerick. He then went on to complete a PhD at the University of Sheffield. A research career followed, taking him to UK. France, Germany, and the United States. It was during this time—working on a some patents at the University of Kentucky—that his interest in IP was sparked.
“I read my original proposal to the university for the patent and then saw the final patent application,” he recalls. “They were both describing the same thing but in completely different ways. I found that transformation fascinating.”
After returning to the UK with a young family and looking for a more stable career path, Lawrence applied to the UKIPO—and never looked back.
Building a Reputation in SPCs
Lawrence spent just under three decades at the UKIPO. Initially as a patent examiner, then working in policy and trademarks en route to becoming a Deputy Director and Hearing Officer in patents. His experience spans petrochemicals, cosmetics. pharmaceuticals and biotech, but it’s his specialism in SPCs that has become his hallmark.
“What makes SPCs so challenging is that they sit at the intersection of patent law and regulatory law,” he explains. “They’re not just a patent extension. They’re a sui generis right—unique in legal terms—and require a good understanding of both systems.”
As a Hearing Officer, Lawrence was responsible for reviewing disputed SPC applications. He often found himself deciding issues involving the UK’s approach to SPC case law for the first time. His decisions, nearly all of which were appealed (and subsequently upheld) helped clarify regulatory grey areas and provided vital guidance in a field where every word of the relevant legislation is scrutinised.
“It is not surprising that these decisions were nearly always appealed” he says “given the commercial value of the right being sought. Aa single granted SPC could be worth millions. That’s why nearly every one of the 19 articles in the relevant regulation has been argued over and litigated!”
A New Consultancy for a Complex Landscape
Now, Lawrence is offering his specialist knowledge directly to clients through his new consultancy. His goal? To support life sciences businesses, patent attorneys, and legal teams as they deal with complex SPC and pharmaceutical patent issues.
“If someone comes to me and asks, ‘Can I get an SPC based on this patent and this marketing authorisation?’ I can help them assess the options—perhaps even identify strategies they hadn’t considered.”
His expertise is particularly valuable at critical decision points: choosing the right patent to base an SPC on, assessing post-grant amendment possibilities, and anticipating how a granting authority might interpret a borderline case.
“Most people only apply for one SPC in a given matter, so there’s a lot riding on getting it right,” he adds. “My job is to bring clarity and reduce uncertainty.”
Beyond the Patent Office
Lawrence’s consultancy work is already expanding. He supports clients with early-stage planning, responds to refusals, and even helps those opposing SPCs in competitive scenarios. He’s also involved in academic research as a Visiting Scholar at the University of Sheffield, exploring the foundations and future of the SPC system.
His aim is to ensure that clients not only understand how the system works today but are also prepared for the changes ahead.
“We’re entering a more complex regulatory environment—particularly with medical devices and software becoming integral to treatments. That’s going to create new questions around if and how SPCs apply.”
Still Curious, Still Learning
Despite decades in the field, Lawrence’s enthusiasm remains undimmed.
“Every problem is slightly different. I still enjoy the ambiguity. You’re often working on the balance of probabilities, not certainties. That keeps it fresh.”
That curiosity extends beyond the office. When not immersed in SPC regulations, Lawrence is likely to be out walking stretches of the Wales Coast Path. Or, cheering from the stands at rugby games. A recent trip to Australia for the British & Irish Lions tour being a particular highlight.
“Being there and seeing the games in person was incredible. I’ve played the game, coached it, and still find it endlessly fascinating.”
How Lawrence Can Help
If you’re navigating SPCs—whether preparing an application, managing a refusal, or just trying to understand your strategic options—Lawrence is ready to help. With in-dept knowledge of how decisions are made and why, his consultancy offers a rare depth of insight for those operating in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and biotech sectors.To get in touch with Lawrence or learn more about his services, connect via LinkedIn
A Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) is an intellectual property right that extends the protection of a patented active ingredient in a pharmaceutical or plant protection product. SPCs compensate for the time it takes to obtain regulatory approval before a product can be sold, offering up to five additional years of market exclusivity after a patent expires. Because they sit at the intersection of patent and regulatory law, SPCs are both legally and commercially significant—yet often misunderstood. This article explores their impact and the unique expertise Lawrence Cullen brings to this space.
Some careers are forged by ambition. Others by curiosity. For Joeeta Murphy, it was both. A former research scientist turned top-tier patent attorney, Joeeta blends a deep love of science with a sharp legal mind—bringing decades of insight to the ever-evolving world of life sciences intellectual property.
Now Head of Life Sciences at ip21, Joeeta’s career spans more than 30 years and reflects her unique ability to bridge two complex worlds: cutting-edge science and rigorous intellectual property strategy.
A Scientist at Heart, A Strategist by Choice
Joeeta began her career working on vaccines, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s research. But it was a law A-Level—taken in the evening out of sheer interest—that set her on a new path. “I didn’t want to give up science, but I also really enjoyed the legal side,” she explains. “Becoming a patent attorney allowed me to do both.”
That instinct paid off. Joeeta went on to complete an MSc in IP Management at Queen Mary, London, and qualified as a UK and European Patent Attorney. She now also holds the CIPA Litigation Certificate and is registered to represent clients before the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
But ask her which qualification was the toughest? “Definitely my MPhil in pharmaceutical sciences. It was a pure research degree—I was on my own, designing experiments and trying to make discoveries. That experience gave me huge respect for inventors. It’s what they do every day.”
The Power of Perspective
That scientific empathy has shaped Joeeta’s entire career. Whether advising startups or representing multinationals in high-stakes oppositions, she takes a tailored approach—always grounded in clarity, context, and commercial awareness.
“With startups, the focus is on budget and timing. We work closely to prioritise their innovations, patent filings and avoid early disclosure,” she explains. “With multinationals, it’s about building expansive, global patent portfolios and aligning with long-term product lifecycles.”
It’s a skillset that’s earned her a place on the IAM Strategy 300 list, for the third year running, recognising the world’s leading IP strategists.
A Career Highlight: Uncovering Hidden Value
Among her many successes, one case stands out. After reviewing a client’s large patent portfolio following an acquisition, Joeeta identified a buried platform patent with huge potential. “Several competitors were already in clinical trials using that technology—it was a clear case of infringement.”
Her work led to successful EPO oppositions, strategic pre-litigation moves, and ultimately a lucrative licensing deal for the client. “It was high pressure but incredibly rewarding. That’s when the job is really fun.”
Vision, Leadership and a Global Outlook
As head of ip21’s Life Sciences team, Joeeta combines legal excellence with natural leadership. “It all comes down to organisation and understanding priorities,” she says. She actively mentors young innovators through initiatives like the Trinity Bradfield Prize, and sits on the CIPA Council, helping shape the profession’s future.
For her, the best IP strategies are deeply embedded in a company’s broader goals. “Your IP should evolve with your business—identifying what to protect, where, and why. Freedom to operate and patentability searches are vital. So is knowing when to prune a portfolio.”
She’s also a passionate advocate for staying up to date. “Technology is always moving—so we have to move with it. That means reading constantly, attending conferences, and learning from our clients, who are often the real subject-matter experts.”
Life Outside IP: Snorkels, Spices and Cambridgeshire Walks
When she’s not in the courtroom or mentoring PhD students, Joeeta unwinds with cooking, countryside walks, and the occasional snorkelling adventure. “I’ve tried windsurfing—failed miserably,” she laughs. “But snorkelling in the Red Sea and in Key West, Florida was incredible.”
Her favourite recipe? A Bengali classic: chilli chicken, rich with spices and colour. “I love cooking with my children. They’ve picked up my tips and cook on their own now, which is brilliant.”
As for her go-to walk? “Around the Wimpole Estate in Cambridgeshire. It’s beautiful, and not too steep,” she says, smiling. “We also love visiting the Lake District and enjoy the circular walks and mountain scenery.”
A Lasting Legacy
Looking ahead, Joeeta is optimistic. “AI will transform drug discovery. Biotech innovation continues to accelerate. I want our Life Sciences team at ip21 to be at the forefront—offering the kind of support that makes a real difference to our clients’ success.”
And with Joeeta leading the way, there’s no doubt they will be.
Connect with Joeeta
If you’d like to follow more of Joeeta’s work or connect professionally, you can find her on LinkedIn. To explore the innovative IP services offered by her team, visit ip21 Ltd—a firm at the forefront of life sciences and biotech intellectual property.
PS: PatWorld works closely with leading Patent Attorneys like Joeeta Murphy to provide professional, reliable patent search services—including Freedom to Operate (FTO), Patentability, and Collection (State-of-the-Art) searches. Learn more.
PatWorld Global IP Research Services
Patent, Design, and Trademark Research Experts with a combined experience of over 200 years in Intellectual Property searching. Highly trained, dynamic in-house research teams specialising in a wide range of subject matter. All our analysts follow a training program developed by former IPO Examiners. Our teams are available to discuss any specific technical points regarding your search enquiries.
Order a Search Now